The selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control agents: Is there still room for improvement?

被引:0
|
作者
Briese, DT [1 ]
Heard, TA [1 ]
McFadyen, RE [1 ]
Sheppard, A [1 ]
Jacob, HS [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Entomol, CRC Australian Weed Management, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
biological control; weeds; biocontrol agent selection; host-specificity; biocontrol agent evaluation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The recently formed Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management now comprises almost all researchers in Australia who work on the classical biological control of weeds. This workshop was organised by the CRC to take stock of recent Australian research in biological control of interest to it and to suggest how the CRC can address key areas of concern for weed biological control; namely, the selection of biological control agents, agent host-specificity determination and the evaluation of agent impact. The workshop was arranged around a set of issues papers for each area, followed by discussions held amongst the workshop participants aimed at informing the research agenda of the new CRC and developing a common approach to the discipline in Australia. The issues papers and syntheses of the discussions held and recommendations made are contained in these proceedings.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 3
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What is needed to improve the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control agents: Workshop synthesis and recommendations
    Sheppard, AW
    Heard, TA
    Briese, DT
    IMPROVING THE SELECTION, TESTING AND EVALUATION OF WEED BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, (07): : 87 - 98
  • [2] Selection of pathogen agents in weed biological control: critical issues and peculiarities in relation to arthropod agents
    Morin, Louise
    Evans, Katherine J.
    Sheppard, Andrew W.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2006, 45 : 349 - 365
  • [3] Economic evaluation in telemedicine - still room for improvement
    Bergmo, Trine S.
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2010, 16 (05) : 229 - 231
  • [4] Can genomic signatures guide the selection of host-specific agents for weed biological control?
    Kumaran, Nagalingam
    Raghu, S.
    EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2024, 17 (07):
  • [5] Review of approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of weed biological control agents
    Morin, L.
    Reid, A. M.
    Sims-Chilton, N. M.
    Buckley, Y. M.
    Dhileepan, K.
    Hastwell, G. T.
    Nordblom, T. L.
    Raghu, S.
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2009, 51 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [6] Effectiveness of classical weed biological control agents released in Australia
    Cullen, J. M.
    Sheppard, A. W.
    Raghu, S.
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2022, 166
  • [7] Systematic cultivar selection for weed biological control risk assessment
    Lefoe, Greg
    Hauser, Cindy E.
    Steel, Jackie
    Slater, Anthony T.
    Kwong, Raelene M.
    Lubanga, Umar K.
    Rumpff, Libby
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2022, 165
  • [8] Refining the ecological basis for agent selection in weed biological control
    Raghu, S.
    van Klinken, Rieks D.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2006, 45 : 251 - 252
  • [9] Interactions between two biological control agents and their target weed: a beetle, a bug and a cactus weed
    Mnqeta, Zezethu
    Paterson, Iain D.
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 29 (10) : 979 - 990
  • [10] Molecular diagnostic testing in lung cancer in real life - still room for improvement
    Ostermann, H.
    Boeschen, D.
    Ukena, D.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 41 : 109 - 109