A scoping review of antibiotic use practices and drivers of inappropriate antibiotic use in animal farms in WHO Southeast Asia region

被引:16
|
作者
Malijan, Greco Mark [1 ]
Howteerakul, Nopporn [2 ]
Ali, Natasha [1 ]
Siri, Sukhontha [2 ]
Kengganpanich, Mondha [3 ]
OH-DART Study Grp, Oh-dart [4 ]
Nascimento, Roger [1 ]
Booton, Ross D. [5 ]
Turner, Katherine M. E. [4 ]
Cooper, Ben S. [1 ,6 ]
Meeyai, Aronrag [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Ctr Trop Med & Global Hlth, Nuffield Dept Clin Med, Oxford OX1 3SY, England
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 420-1 Ratchawithi Rd, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Educ & Behav Sci, 420-1 Ratchawithi Rd, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[4] Univ Bristol, Bristol BS40 5DU, England
[5] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, 133-155 Waterloo Rd, London SE1 8UG, England
[6] Mahidol Univ, Fac Trop Med, Mahidol Oxford Trop Med Res Unit, Bangkok, Thailand
[7] Level 50 Peter Medawar Bldg,South Pk Rd, Oxford OX1 3SY, England
关键词
Antibiotic use; Antimicrobial resistance; Animal farms; Southeast Asia; One health; Farming practices; ANTIMICROBIAL-USE; GLOBAL TRENDS; FOOD-ANIMALS; PERSPECTIVE; RESISTANCE; USAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100412
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Antibiotic use (ABU) plays an important role in the proliferation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Global antimicrobial consumption in food production is projected to rise by 67% from 2010 to 2030, but available estimates are limited by the scarcity of ABU data and absence of global surveillance systems. The WHO SouthEast Asia (WHO SEA) region is at high risk of emergence of AMR, likely driven by intensifying farm operations and worsening ABU hotspots. However, little is known about farm-level ABU practices in the region. To summarize emerging evidence and research gaps, we conducted a scoping review of ABU practices following the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework. We included studies published between 2010 and 2021 on farm-level ABU/AMR in the 11 WHO SEA member states, and databases were last searched on 31 October 2021. Our search strategy identified 184 unique articles, and 25 publications underwent full-text eligibility assessment. Seventeen studies, reported in 18 publications, were included in the scoping review. We found heterogeneity in the categorizations, definitions, and ABU characterization methods used across studies and farm types. Most studies involved poultry, pig, and cattle farms, and only one study examined aquaculture. Most studies evaluated ABU prevalence by asking respondents about the presence or absence of ABU in the farm. Only two studies quantified antibiotic consumption, and sampling bias and lack of standardized data collection methods were identified as key limitations. Emerging evidence that farm workers had difficulty differentiating antibiotics from other substances contributed to the uncertainty about the reliability of self-reported data without other validation techniques. ABU for growth promotion and treatment were prevalent. We found a large overlap in the critically important antibiotics used in farm animals and humans. The ease of access to antibiotics compounded by the difficulties in accessing quality veterinary care and preventive services likely drive inappropriate ABU in complex ways.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring gender differences in knowledge and practices related to antibiotic use in Southeast Asia: A scoping review
    Pham-Duc, Phuc
    Sriparamananthan, Kavitha
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [2] Review of antibiotic use and resistance in food animal production in WHO South-East Asia Region
    Malik, Hina
    Singh, Randhir
    Kaur, Simranpreet
    Dhaka, Pankaj
    Bedi, Jasbir Singh
    Gill, J. P. S.
    Gongal, Gyanendra
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 16 : 172 - 182
  • [3] Market and policy drivers of antibiotic use in smallholder periurban dairy farms: A scoping literature review
    Chatterjee, P.
    Kakkar, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 53 : 38 - 38
  • [4] Mapping Worldwide Antibiotic Use in Dental Practices: A Scoping Review
    Soleymani, Fatemeh
    Martinez, Carlos Perez-Albacete
    Makiabadi, Mehrdad
    de Val, Jose Eduardo Mate Sanchez
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (09):
  • [5] Practices and drivers for antibiotic use in cattle production systems in Kenya
    Kisoo, Lydiah
    Muloi, Dishon M.
    Oguta, Walter
    Ronoh, Daisy
    Kirwa, Lynn
    Akoko, James
    Fevre, Eric M.
    Moodley, Arshnee
    Wambua, Lillian
    ONE HEALTH, 2023, 17
  • [6] Drivers of inappropriate antibiotic use in low- and middle-income countries
    Otaigbe, Idemudia Imonikhe
    Elikwu, Charles John
    JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2023, 5 (03):
  • [7] Determinants of animal disease and nontherapeutic antibiotic use on smallholder livestock farms
    Emes, Eve
    Kagambega, Asseta
    Dione, Michel
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 10
  • [8] Understanding veterinary drug shop workers' knowledge and practices to identify drivers of antibiotic use in Vietnamese livestock farms
    Nohrborg, Sandra
    Nguyen-Thi, Thinh
    Xuan, Huyen Nguyen
    Hai, Yen Luu Thi
    Lindahl, Johanna
    Boqvist, Sofia
    Jaerhult, Josef D.
    Magnusson, Ulf
    VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SCIENCE, 2024, 10 (04)
  • [9] Review of the pharmacodynamics of antibiotic use in animal food production
    Florea, NF
    Nightingale, CH
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2004, 49 (02) : 105 - 108
  • [10] EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS ON INAPPROPRIATE USE OF CLINICAL PRACTICES IN SPAIN: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Quirland, C.
    Sola, I
    Leache, L.
    Saiz, L. C.
    Gutierrez-Valencia, M.
    Alamo-Junquera, D.
    Rubio-Valera, M.
    Aznar, I
    Requeijo-Lorenzo, C.
    Santero, M.
    Savall, O.
    Breton, I
    de Miguel-Diez, J.
    Bonfill, X.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S282 - S282