Research utility of the National Violent Death Reporting System: a scoping review

被引:22
|
作者
Nazarov, Oybek [1 ,3 ]
Guan, Joseph [2 ]
Chihuri, Stanford [1 ,3 ]
Li, Guohua [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Rush Med Coll, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Ctr Injury Epidemiol & Prevent, 622 West 168th St,PH5-534, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
Epidemiology; Homicide; Injury; Knowledge domain; National Violent Death Reporting System; Scoping review; Suicide; Violence; CALL;
D O I
10.1186/s40621-019-0196-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo better understand and prevent suicide and homicide, the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) in six states in 2002. As of 2018, the NVDRS has been expanded to include all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The purpose of this review was to assess the research utility of the NVDRS based on studies indexed in major bibliographical databases.MethodsWe performed a scoping review of published studies that were based on data from the NVDRS, identified by searching six electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, OVID, Scopus, and Web of Science. We examined the time trend of annual NVDRS-based research output, generated a word cloud using the keywords listed in the publications, and mapped the knowledge domains covered by NVDRS-based studies.ResultsOur review included a total of 150 studies published between 2005 and 2018. There was a marked increase in the annual number of NVDRS-based publications, with 120 (80.0%) of the 150 studies published between 2011 and 2018. Overall, 104 (69.3%) studies focused on suicide and 39 (26.0%) on homicide. Of the included studies, 100 (66.7%) were descriptive epidemiology, 31 (20.7%) were risk factor analyses, 9 (6.0%) were evaluations, 7 (4.7%) were trend analyses, and 4 (2.7%) were data quality assessments. Knowledge domain mapping identified two major clusters of studies, one on suicide and the other on homicide. The cluster on suicide was commonly linked to "circumstance," "alcohol" and "substance abuse" and the cluster on homicide was commonly linked to "firearm," "injury," and "gang." The two clusters were interlinked to overlapping networks of keywords, such as "firearm" and "mental health problem."ConclusionsResearch utility of the NVDRS has increased considerably in recent years. Studies based on data from the NVDRS are clustered in two knowledge domains - suicide and homicide. The vast potential of the NVDRS for violence research and prevention remains to be fully exploited.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research utility of the National Violent Death Reporting System: a scoping review
    Oybek Nazarov
    Joseph Guan
    Stanford Chihuri
    Guohua Li
    Injury Epidemiology, 6
  • [2] Research utility and limitations of textual data in the National Violent Death Reporting System: a scoping review and recommendations
    Dang, Linh N.
    Kahsay, Eskira T.
    James, LaTeesa N.
    Johns, Lily J.
    Rios, Isabella E.
    Mezuk, Briana
    INJURY EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [3] Research utility and limitations of textual data in the National Violent Death Reporting System: a scoping review and recommendations
    Linh N. Dang
    Eskira T. Kahsay
    LaTeesa N. James
    Lily J. Johns
    Isabella E. Rios
    Briana Mezuk
    Injury Epidemiology, 10
  • [4] The Research Utility of the National Violent Death Reporting System for Understanding Homicide Trends
    Rogers, Ethan M.
    Davis, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2024, 40 (01) : 26 - 47
  • [5] A truly national National Violent Death Reporting System
    Barber, Catherine
    Azrael, Deborah
    Hemenway, David
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2013, 19 (04) : 225 - 226
  • [6] The US National Violent Death Reporting System
    Friday, J. C.
    Barker, L.
    Pless, B.
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2006, 12 (06) : 355 - 355
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence and the National Violent Death Reporting System
    Lindley, Lisa C.
    Policastro, Christina N.
    Dosch, Brianne
    Baco, Joshua G. Ortiz
    Cao, Charles Q.
    CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2024, 42 (05) : 369 - 376
  • [8] Integrating National Violent Death Reporting System Data into Maternal Mortality Review Committees
    Miller, Jennifer M.
    Rensing, Susan
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 30 (11) : 1573 - 1579
  • [9] The National Violent Death Reporting System Past, Present, and Future
    Crosby, Alex E.
    Mercy, James A.
    Houry, Debra
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 51 (05) : S169 - S172
  • [10] The National Violent Death Reporting System: overview and future directions
    Blair, Janet M.
    Fowler, Katherine A.
    Jack, Shane P. D.
    Crosby, Alexander E.
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2016, 22 : 6 - 11