Economy-wide impacts of REDD when there is political influence

被引:4
|
作者
Laing, Timothy [1 ,2 ]
Palmer, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Geog & Environm, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Grantham Res Inst Climate Change & Environm, London WC2A 2AE, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
REDD; Political influence; General equilibrium; Climate change; Sustainable forest management; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; FOREST CONSERVATION; POLICY; DEFORESTATION; PAYMENTS; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.03.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
National-level strategies for reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDO), financed by international transfers, have begun to emerge. A three-sector model is developed to explore the economy-wide effects of two policies implemented by a government participating in REDD that differ in how they bring together incentives and benefit sharing: an incentive payment scheme where these are intrinsically linked and taxes where they are-separated. Two sectors utilise forest as an input to production, one in which forest is substitutable for labour, producing a carbon externality, and one in which forest and labour are complements and where forest is used sustainably. Two important effects determine model outcomes. First, the government factors in general equilibrium effects when determining the efficient payment level. This implies that the level of international transfers is not fully passed through to the forest-using sectors. Second, even though the sustainable sector receives no incentive payment it can increase in size through the effect of REDD payments on markets. With political influence, where incentives and benefit sharing are linked the forest-using sectors may lobby for lower payment rates for themselves in order to create a larger international transfer. Where there is a separation between incentives and benefit-sharing this effect disappears. The findings indicate that REDD may be less cost-effective than envisioned at the international level. (c) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 126
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Economy-wide impacts of biofuels in Argentina
    Timilsina, Govinda R.
    Chisari, Omar O.
    Romero, Carlos A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 55 : 636 - 647
  • [2] Economy-wide impacts of road transport electrification in the EU
    Tamba, Marie
    Krause, Jette
    Weitzel, Matthias
    Ioan, Raileanu
    Duboz, Louison
    Grosso, Monica
    Vandyck, Toon
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 182
  • [3] Estimating the economy-wide impacts of energy policies in Cyprus
    Taliotis, Constantinos
    Giannakis, Elias
    Karmellos, Marios
    Fylaktos, Nestor
    Zachariadis, Theodoros
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 29 (29)
  • [4] Economy-wide and employment impacts of road construction and maintenance investment
    Tan, Fiona
    Tsolakis, Dimitris
    [J]. Road and Transport Research, 2013, 22 (04): : 56 - 69
  • [5] The role of rurality in determining the economy-wide impacts of a natural disaster
    Bonfiglio, Andrea
    Coderoni, Silvia
    Esposti, Roberto
    Baldoni, Edoardo
    [J]. ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (04) : 446 - 469
  • [6] Terrorism and inbound tourism in Egypt: Economy-wide and distributional impacts
    Elshennawy, Abeer
    Siddig, Khalid
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2023, 27 (03) : 1910 - 1933
  • [7] Economy-wide and employment impacts of road construction and maintenance investment
    Tan, Fiona
    Tsolakis, Dimitris
    [J]. ROAD & TRANSPORT RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (04): : 56 - 69
  • [8] The business revolution: Economy-wide impacts of artificial intelligence and digital platforms
    Halaburda, Hanna
    Prince, Jeffrey
    Sokol, D. Daniel
    Zhu, Feng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2024, 33 (02) : 269 - 275
  • [10] The Economy-wide Impacts of a Rise in the Capital Adequacy Ratios of Australian Banks
    Giesecke, James A.
    Dixon, Peter B.
    Rimmer, Maureen T.
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 2017, 93 : 16 - 37