Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Incomplete Excision of High-risk Basal Cell Carcinoma

被引:4
|
作者
Ceder, Hannah [1 ,2 ]
Ekstrom, Annie [1 ]
Hadzic, Lajla [1 ]
Paoli, John [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Dermatol & Venereol, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol & Venereol, Reg Vastra Gotaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
basal cell carcinoma; non-melanoma skin cancer; keratinocyte cancer; Mohs micrographic surgery; incomplete excision; risk factors; MOHS MICROGRAPHIC SURGERY; CLINICAL-FEATURES; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; MARGINS; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.2340/00015555-3856
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Research has shown higher rates of incomplete excision among high-risk than low-risk basal cell carcinomas, but data is limited. A single-centre, retrospective study including excised high-risk basal cell carcinomas (type II-III according to the Swedish classification) was performed to determine incomplete excision rates and associated clinicopathological risk factors. Overall, 987 consecutive cases were included. Of these, 203 (20.6%) were incompletely excised. Incomplete excision rates were higher for type III basal cell carcinomas (27.0% vs 17.6% for type II, p < 0.001) and localization on the face and scalp (22.4% vs 14.7% for other locations, p = 0.009), especially on the nose, ear, scalp and periorbital area (28.0-37.0% vs 9.5-16.9% for other locations, p < 0.0001). Circular excisions were also more often incomplete (28.5%) compared with elliptical excisions (17.7%) (p < 0.001). No association was found between incomplete excision rates and tumour size, excision margins, use of a pre-operative biopsy or surgeon experience. Mohs micrographic surgery should be used more often for type II-III basal cell carcinomas on the face and scalp.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH INCOMPLETE EXCISION OF HIGH-RISK BASAL CELL CARCINOMA
    Ceder, Hannah
    Paoli, John
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2022, 102 : 41 - 42
  • [2] Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Incomplete Excision of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Svensson, Helena
    Paoli, John
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2020, 100 : 1 - 5
  • [3] Risk factors for incomplete excision of basal cell carcinomas
    Bogdanov-Berezovsky, A
    Cohen, AD
    Glesinger, R
    Cagnano, E
    Krieger, Y
    Rosenberg, L
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2004, 84 (01) : 44 - 47
  • [4] Factors associated with incomplete excision of basal cell carcinomas
    Teoh, Y. L.
    Halpern, S. M.
    Shall, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 163 : 55 - 56
  • [5] Incomplete excision of basal cell carcinoma
    Malhotra, R
    Kaines, A
    Davis, G
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 73 (06) : 460 - 460
  • [6] Incomplete excision of basal cell carcinoma:: Rate and associated factors among 362 consecutive cases
    Farhi, David
    Dupin, Nicolas
    Palangie, Andre
    Carlotti, Agnes
    Avril, Marie-Francoise
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2007, 33 (10) : 1207 - 1214
  • [7] Basal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of Factors Associated With Incomplete Excision at a Referral Hospital in Southern Spain
    Husein-ElAhmed, Husein
    Aneiros-Fernandez, Jose
    Gutierrez-Salmeron, Maria-Teresa
    Aneiros-Cachaza, Jose
    Naranjo-Sintes, Ramon
    CUTIS, 2014, 93 (03): : 155 - 161
  • [8] Basal cell carcinomata: Risk factors for incomplete excision and results of re-excision
    Masud, D.
    Moustaki, M.
    Staruch, R.
    Dheansa, B.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2016, 69 (05): : 652 - 656
  • [9] Surgical treatment of basal cell carcinoma: a case series on factors influencing the risk of an incomplete primary excision
    Kappelin, J.
    Nielsen, K.
    Nilsson, F.
    Bjellerup, M.
    Ahnlide, I.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2020, 34 (11) : 2518 - 2525
  • [10] High-risk basal cell carcinoma - an update
    Wollina, U.
    Pabst, F.
    Schorcht, J.
    Kittner, T.
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2010, 8 (07): : 572 - 572