A hard-line reply to Pereboom's four-case Manipulation Argument (Derk Pereboom)

被引：85

作者：

McKenna, Michael ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA

来源：

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH | 2008年 / 77卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00179.x

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：142 / 159

页数：18

共 10 条

[1] Hard- and soft-line responses to Pereboom’s four-case manipulation argument
Ishtiyaque Haji
Stefaan E. Cuypers
[J]. Acta Analytica, 2006, 21 (4) : 19 - 35
[2] The agential perspective: a hard-line reply to the four-case manipulation argument
Jeppsson, Sofia
[J]. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2020, 177 (07) : 1935 - 1951
[3] The agential perspective: a hard-line reply to the four-case manipulation argument
Sofia Jeppsson
[J]. Philosophical Studies, 2020, 177 : 1935 - 1951
[4] A critique of Pereboom's 'four-case argument' for incompatibilism
Mele, AR
[J]. ANALYSIS, 2005, 65 (01) : 75 - 80
[5] The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument
Demetriou, Kristin
[J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2010, 88 (04) : 595 - 617
[6] Why causal facts matter: a critique of Jeppsson's hard-line reply to four-case manipulation arguments
Seybold, Samantha L. L.
[J]. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2022,
[7] A hard-line reply to the multiple-case manipulation argument (Michael McKenna)
Pereboom, Derk
[J]. PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 77 (01) : 160 - 170
[8] In defense of hard-line replies to the multiple-case manipulation argument
Daniel Haas
[J]. Philosophical Studies, 2013, 163 : 797 - 811
[9] In defense of hard-line replies to the multiple-case manipulation argument
Haas, Daniel
[J]. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2013, 163 (03) : 797 - 811
[10] Manipulation Arguments, Basic Desert, and Moral Responsibility: Assessing Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life
McKenna M.
[J]. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2017, 11 (3) : 575 - 589

← 1 →