All-Inside Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears: Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

被引:37
|
作者
Ardizzone, Carolyn A. [1 ]
Houck, Darby A. [1 ]
McCartney, Derek W. [1 ]
Vidal, Armando F. [1 ,2 ]
Frank, Rachel M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Orthoped, Div Sports Med & Shoulder Surg, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Steadman Clin, Vail, CO USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2020年 / 48卷 / 13期
关键词
meniscus; all-inside; bucket-handle; arthroscopic; ARTHROSCOPIC EVALUATION; MEDIAL MENISCUS; HUMAN KNEE; FOLLOW-UP; SUTURE; MENISCECTOMY; DEVICE; AREA;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520906141
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is no consensus on technique of choice for repair of bucket-handle meniscal tears (BHMTs). Purpose: To determine factors that affect patient outcomes and failure rates in patients undergoing all-inside repairs of BHMTs. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of 3 databases using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed. All English-language literature from 1993 to 2019 describing clinical outcomes for patients undergoing all-inside BHMT repair with >= 12-month follow-up was reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Patient characteristics (patient sex, age), intraoperative factors (laterality, concomitant procedures, surgical technique, implants utilized), and postoperative outcomes (failure rates) were analyzed. Study quality was evaluated with the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS). Results: Fifteen studies (1 level 1, 4 level 3, 10 level 4) with 763 total patients (64% male; average age, 26.4 years [range, 9-58 years]; average follow-up, 39.8 months [range, 12-120 months]) including 396 all-inside BHMT repairs were included. Six devices were used for repair including the Meniscal Repair System, FasT-Fix, Meniscus Arrow, Biofix Arrow, RapidLoc device, and PDS II suture, with failure rates of 13.5%, 22.4%, 27.1%, 42.9%, 45.2%, and 0%, respectively. The overall repair failure rate was 29.3% at an average of 13.0 months (range, 5.0-32.4 months), but 19.0% for devices still in use. The RapidLoc and Biofix Arrow had higher failure rates than other devices (P = .0003). Women (31%) were less likely to experience a failure than were men (69%) (P = .03). Longer follow-up duration resulted in higher failure rates (>30 months, 34.4%; <30 months, 23.4%; P = .016). In 4 studies reporting on both all-inside and inside-out repairs, no significant differences in failure rates were observed. No significant differences in failure rates were found between medial and lateral repairs nor repair with and without concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (P > .05 for all). The overall average MCMS was 54.4 +/- 12. Conclusion: The overall failure rate after all-inside repair of BHMTs is 29.3% at an average of 13.0 months, with no difference in failure rates between medial and lateral meniscal repairs. The variables shown to negatively affect the failure rates were the RapidLoc and Biofix Arrow, male sex, and longer follow-up duration.
引用
收藏
页码:3386 / 3393
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR ALL-INSIDE REPAIR OF BUCKET-HANDLE MENISCAL TEARS
    Yuen, W. L. P.
    Kuo, C. L.
    Goh, K. M. J.
    Lee, Y. H. D.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 32 (SUPPL 1) : S269 - S269
  • [2] Technique for All-Inside Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears
    Yuen, Wen Loong Paul
    Kuo, Chung Liang
    Goh, Keng Meng Jeremy
    Lee, Yee Han Dave
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2021, 10 (03): : e743 - e750
  • [3] Comparative Outcomes of All-Inside Versus Inside-Out Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
    Samuelsen, Brian T.
    Johnson, Nicholas R.
    Hevesi, Mario
    Levy, Bruce A.
    Dahm, Diane L.
    Stuart, Michael J.
    Krych, Aaron J.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06):
  • [4] A suture technique for easier reduction and repair of bucket-handle meniscal tears while using the all-inside devices
    Cetinkaya, Engin
    Kuyucu, Ersin
    Gul, Murat
    Lapcin, Osman
    Albayrak, Kutalmis
    Gursu, Sarper
    [J]. SICOT-J, 2016, 2
  • [5] COMBINED INSIDE-OUT AND ALL-INSIDE TECHNIQUE IN BUCKET-HANDLE MENISCUS TEARS
    Yilmaz, Serdar
    Cankaya, Deniz
    Firat, Ahmet
    Deveci, Alper
    Ozkurt, Bulent
    Bozkurt, Murat
    [J]. ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2016, 24 (04): : 179 - 183
  • [6] Using a Combined All-Inside, Inside-Out, and Outside-In Technique to Repair Bucket-Handle Medial Meniscal Tears Without a Safety Incision
    Kucharik, Michael P.
    Eberlin, Christopher T.
    Cherian, Nathan J.
    Summers, Melissa A.
    Martin, Scott D.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2023, 12 (07): : E1065 - E1073
  • [7] MRI of meniscal bucket-handle tears
    T. H. Magee
    Gary W. Hinson
    [J]. Skeletal Radiology, 1998, 27 : 495 - 499
  • [8] MRI of meniscal bucket-handle tears
    Magee, TH
    Hinson, GW
    [J]. SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (09) : 495 - 499
  • [9] A novel technique for modified all-inside repair of bucket-handle meniscus tears using standard arthroscopic portals
    Yik, Jing Hui
    Koh, Bryan Thean Howe
    Wang, Wilson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2017, 12
  • [10] A novel technique for modified all-inside repair of bucket-handle meniscus tears using standard arthroscopic portals
    Jing Hui Yik
    Bryan Thean Howe Koh
    Wilson Wang
    [J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 12