Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:163
|
作者
Markar, S. R. [1 ]
Karthikesalingam, A. [2 ]
Thrumurthy, S. [2 ]
Muirhead, L. [1 ]
Kinross, J. [1 ]
Paraskeva, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marys Hosp, Acad Surg Unit, London W2 1NY, England
[2] St George Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, London, England
关键词
Pancreatobilio; Cancer; Cholecystectomy; SILS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; STANDARD; PAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has gained increasing attention due to the potential to maximize the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this systematic review and pooled analysis was to compare clinical outcome following SILS and standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of gallstone-related disease. An electronic search of Embase and Medline databases for articles from 1966 to 2011 was performed. Publications were included if they were randomised controlled studies in which patients underwent either single-incision or multiport cholecystectomy. The primary outcome measures for the meta-analysis were postoperative complications and postoperative pain score [visual analogue scale (VAS) on the day of surgery]. Secondary outcome measures were operating time and length of hospital stay. Weighted mean difference was calculated for the effect size of SILS on continuous variables, and pooled odds ratios were calculated for discrete variables. In total, 375 cholecystectomy operations from 7 randomised controlled trials were included, 195 by single-incision (SILS) and 180 by conventional multiport. Operating time was significantly longer in the SILS group compared to the standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (weighted mean difference = 2.13; P = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative pain score (VAS), or the length of hospital stay between the two groups. The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure for the treatment of uncomplicated gallstone disease, with postoperative outcome similar to that of standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Future high-powered randomized studies should be focused on elucidating subtle differences in postoperative complications, reported postoperative pain, and cosmesis following SILS cholecystectomy in more severe biliary disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1213
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    S. R. Markar
    A. Karthikesalingam
    S. Thrumurthy
    L. Muirhead
    J. Kinross
    P. Paraskeva
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 1205 - 1213
  • [2] Authors' reply to: single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Markar, Sheraz
    Kinross, James
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (10): : 3000 - 3001
  • [3] Authors’ reply to: single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sheraz Markar
    James Kinross
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 3000 - 3001
  • [4] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of the literature
    Mark Portelli
    Samuel Attard
    Tonio Bezzina
    [J]. European Surgery, 2023, 55 : 54 - 59
  • [5] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of the literature
    Portelli, Mark
    Attard, Samuel
    Bezzina, Tonio
    [J]. EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA, 2023, 55 (02): : 54 - 59
  • [6] Single-Incision vs. Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: An Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yuan, Ye
    Jian, Jianing
    Jing, Hailiang
    Yan, Ran
    You, Fengming
    Fu, Xi
    Du, Linke
    Li, Wenyuan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [7] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs. Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Pankaj Garg
    Jai Deep Thakur
    Mahak Garg
    Geetha R. Menon
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2012, 16 : 1618 - 1628
  • [8] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs. Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Garg, Pankaj
    Thakur, Jai Deep
    Garg, Mahak
    Menon, Geetha R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (08) : 1618 - 1628
  • [9] Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic splenectomy
    Wu, Shike
    Lai, Hao
    Zhao, Jiangyang
    Deng, Xin
    Wei, Jianbao
    Liang, Jian
    Mo, Xianwei
    Chen, Jiansi
    Lin, Yuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2018, 14 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [10] Robotic Single-Incision Cholecystectomy vs Laparoscopic Single-Incision Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Lima Fonseca Rodrigues, Amanda Cyntia
    Nunes, Gabrielle Amaral
    Murari, Jean C.
    Andrade, Fernando Pontes
    Alencar, Mayara D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S315 - S315