Nanofiltration of nonionic surfactants: Effect of the molecular weight cutoff and contact angle on flux behavior

被引:54
|
作者
Cornelis, G
Boussu, K
Van der Bruggen, B
Devreese, I
Vandecasteele, C
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Chem Engn, Lab Appl Phys Chem & Environm Technol, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Centexbel Gent, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ie0501226
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Nonionic surfactants are widely used in industry, and large amounts of wastewater containing nonionic surfactants are produced each year. Nanofiltration (NF) is a possible option to purify these waters, reducing the overall water consumption and enhancing biological purification. However, the flux behavior of NF during purification of wastewaters containing nonionic surfactants is not well understood. NF tests were performed with both synthetic solutions and real wastewaters containing nonionic surfactants from carpet rinsing. When a membrane with a relatively high molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) was chosen, flux decreased to a level lower than that with most ultrafiltration membranes. When a low MWCO was chosen, flux either increased above pure water flux when a relatively hydrophobic membrane was chosen or decreased when a relatively hydrophilic membrane was chosen. NF thus seems feasible to reduce water usage in industrial processes involving nonionic surfactants when a proper membrane is selected. It appeared that flux is controlled by three mechanisms: first, the narrowing of membrane pores through adsorption of monomers when the MWCO is comparable or larger than the monomer size, causing flux decline; second, an improved wettability of the membrane surface through adsorption of monomers on hydrophobic groups, causing flux to increase above pure water flux; third, a decreased wettability through adsorption of monomers on hydrophilic groups, causing flux decline. The nonionic surfactant concentration, MWCO, and membrane's hydrophilicity determine which mechanism is dominant.
引用
收藏
页码:7652 / 7658
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] METHOD FOR DETERMINING MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF NONIONIC SURFACTANTS
    KOFANOV, VI
    BARBOI, VM
    INDUSTRIAL LABORATORY, 1971, 37 (01): : 67 - &
  • [2] INTERACTION BEHAVIOR IN ULTRAFILTRATION OF NONIONIC SURFACTANTS .1. FLUX BEHAVIOR
    DOULIA, D
    GEKAS, V
    TRAGARDH, G
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1992, 69 (03) : 251 - 258
  • [3] Molecular behavior of ionic and nonionic surfactants in saline medium
    Santos, Francisco Klebson G.
    Barros Neto, Eduardo L.
    Moura, Maria Carlenise P. A.
    Castro Dantas, Tereza N.
    Dantas Neto, Afonso A.
    COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2009, 333 (1-3) : 156 - 162
  • [4] CONTACT-ANGLE CHANGES FOR HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC SURFACES INDUCED BY NONIONIC SURFACTANTS
    SCALES, PJ
    GRIESER, F
    FURLONG, DN
    HEALY, TW
    COLLOIDS AND SURFACES, 1986, 21 : 55 - 68
  • [5] Effect of molecular weight for nonionic surfactants derived from renewable raw material on micellization process
    Quiroz-Hernandez, Bulmaro
    Lara-Yescas, Maria-Felicitas
    Carro, Shirley
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS, 2024,
  • [6] Stereochemistry as a Parameter to Tune the Molecular Weight Cutoff in Solvent-Resistant Nanofiltration Membranes
    Thijs, Marloes
    Van Goethem, Cedric
    Vankelecom, Ivo
    Koeckelberghs, Guy
    MACROMOLECULES, 2023, 57 (02) : 739 - 744
  • [8] Evaporative Light Scattering Detector: Toward a General Molecular Weight Cutoff Characterization of Nanofiltration Membranes
    Li, Xianfeng
    Monsuur, Fred
    Denoulet, Bart
    Dobrak, Agnieszka
    Vandezande, Pieter
    Vankelecom, Ivo F. J.
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 81 (05) : 1801 - 1809
  • [9] EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON THE AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR OF NONIONIC SURFACTANTS IN AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS
    ZANA, R
    WEILL, C
    JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE LETTRES, 1985, 46 (20): : L953 - L960
  • [10] EFFECTS OF MOLECULAR-WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION OF NONIONIC SURFACTANTS ON STABILITY OF O/W EMULSIONS
    SAITO, Y
    SATO, T
    ANAZAWA, I
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 1990, 67 (03) : 145 - 148