Factors associated with the use of episiotomy during vaginal delivery

被引:27
|
作者
Hueston, WJ [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WISCONSIN,DEPT FAMILY MED,EAU CLAIRE FAMILY PRACTICE RESIDENCY,EAU CLAIRE,WI 54701
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 1996年 / 87卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0029-7844(96)00068-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine factors associated with the performance of episiotomy. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 8647 deliveries during 1991 and 1992 at five medical centers. Episiotomy rates were compared based on variables involving patient demographics, obstetric condition, and physician factors for the 6458 vaginal deliveries in the sample. Logistic regression modeling using variables associated in bivariate analysis was performed to examine independent effects of each variable. Results: Several characteristics of the patient, her clinical status, and physician factors were all associated with episiotomy use. The strongest independent predictors of episiotomy were nulliparity (odds ratio [OR] 4.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.59-4.68) and the use of forceps (OR 5.03, 95% CI 3.39-7.46) or Vacuum extraction (OR 3.78, 95% CI 2.36-6.04). Provider specialty and the site of care were also associated independently with episiotomy. Episiotomy use was also associated with major perineal lacerations and an increased length of hospital stay. Conclusion: Although differences in episiotomy rates mainly reflect clinical circumstances, important site-to-site variations and interspecialty differences point to potential areas where physician behaviors influence the performance of episiotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1005
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Epidemiology and factors associated with the use of episiotomy during non instrumental vaginal deliveries in Pakistan
    Usmani, A. T. U.
    Hyder, O. H.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 427 - 427
  • [2] Episiotomy and perineal tears during vaginal delivery: Incidence and risk factors
    Vrapi, E.
    Dajti, I.
    Kerpaci, J.
    Celaj, I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 270 : E57 - E57
  • [3] Trends in and Factors Associated With Episiotomy in the Setting of Nonoperative Vaginal Delivery, 2000-2018
    Logue, Teresa C.
    Wen, Timothy
    Arditi, Brittany
    Huang, Yongmei
    Wright, Jason D.
    D'Alton, Mary E.
    Friedman, Alexander M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 (01): : 110 - 112
  • [4] Predictors of episiotomy use at first spontaneous vaginal delivery
    Robinson, JN
    Norwitz, ER
    Cohen, AP
    Lieberman, E
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (02): : 214 - 218
  • [5] Trends in and Factors Associated With Episiotomy in the Setting of Nonoperative Vaginal Delivery, 2000-2018
    Levine, Elliot M.
    Fernandez, Carlos M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 (04): : 694 - 695
  • [6] Is It Possible to Never Perform Episiotomy During Vaginal Delivery?
    Amorim, Melania M.
    Franca-Neto, Antonio H.
    Leal, Nicole V.
    Melo, Fabiana O.
    Maia, Sabina B.
    Alves, Janio N.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 38S - 38S
  • [7] Obstetric mandibular fracture during episiotomy in vaginal delivery
    Akbas, H
    Keskin, M
    Guneren, E
    Eroglu, L
    Belet, N
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2003, 50 (04) : 440 - 441
  • [8] The role of mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery
    Sultan, A. H.
    Thakar, R.
    Ismail, K. M.
    Kalis, V
    Laine, K.
    Raisanen, S. H.
    de Leeuw, J. W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 240 : 192 - 196
  • [9] Operative vaginal delivery and episiotomy
    Murphy, D. J.
    Macleod, M.
    Bahl, R.
    Strachan, B.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (08) : 1065 - 1065
  • [10] Trends in and Factors Associated With Episiotomy in the Setting of Nonoperative Vaginal Delivery, 2000-2018 Reply
    Logue, Teresa C.
    Friedman, Alexander M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 (04): : 695 - 695