Posterior-Based Approaches to Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Bimalleolar and Trimalleolar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Carr, Deborah [1 ]
Vannabouathong, Christopher [2 ]
Petrisor, Bradley A. [3 ,4 ]
Parekh, Selene G. [5 ]
Bhandari, Mohit [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Global Res Solut, Burlington, ON, Canada
[2] OrthoEvidence Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
来源
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY | 2020年 / 59卷 / 02期
关键词
ankle fractures; complications; fracture fixation; fracture healing; lateral approach; posterior approach; SUPERFICIAL PERONEAL NERVE; MALLEOLAR FRACTURES; ANKLE FRACTURES; POSTEROLATERAL APPROACH; FIBULA; SCREW;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2019.09.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Although there is growing evidence supporting posterior-based surgical approaches to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of malleolar fractures, the lateral approach still remains the standard of care for this injury. The purpose of this review was to integrate the results of several studies investigating outcomes following posterior-based approaches to the ORIF of malleolar fractures. The literature search was undertaken using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase. Crude event rates for fracture healing and postoperative complications were calculated. When possible, meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the relative risk of these outcomes between patients treated by posterior-based approaches versus other approaches to ORIF of malleolar fractures. Twenty-two studies were eligible, and 4 studies were included in the meta-analyses. The healing rate was 100% in all patients, regardless of the surgical approach. Overall, 1.26% of patients developed an infection, 0.63% required reoperation, 1.13% experienced aseptic loosening, 5.53% experienced pain after treatment, and 2.52% experienced symptomatic hardware. No malunion or heterotopic ossification was reported in any study. Among patients treated with a posterior-based approach, the most frequently reported complication was infection (2.50%), with lower rates of reoperation and postoperative pain. Patients with trimalleolar fractures experienced slightly poorer outcomes. Patients treated by posterior-based approaches had a significantly increased risk of infection (p = .010) relative to those treated by the lateral approach; patients treated by the lateral approach had a significantly increased risk of pain after surgery (p = .004) and symptomatic hardware (p = .007). This study brought together evidence that posterior-based surgical approaches and non-posterior-based approaches to ORIF are effective in healing malleolar fractures, with significant differences in specific postoperative complications that need to be further explored. (C) 2019 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arthroscopically assisted versus open reduction internal fixation for ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Guangming
    Chen, Nong
    Ji, Linfeng
    Sun, Chengyi
    Ding, Sheng-Long
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [2] Arthroscopically assisted versus open reduction internal fixation for ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guangming Zhang
    Nong Chen
    Linfeng Ji
    Chengyi Sun
    Sheng-Long Ding
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [3] Tourniquet Use During Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Davey, Martin S.
    Davey, Matthew G.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Kearns, Stephen R.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 61 (05): : 1103 - 1108
  • [4] Arthroscopy-Assisted Open Reduction Internal Fixation Versus Conventional Open Reduction Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
    Meyer-Pries, Marc
    Hajymiri, Melika
    Lytras, Theodoros
    Manolopoulos, Philip
    Ntourakis, Dimitrios
    HSS JOURNAL, 2023,
  • [5] Robot-assisted internal fixation of calcaneal fractures versus conventional open reduction internal fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cao, Zhi-yan
    Cui, Bai-hong
    Wang, Fei
    Zhou, Xiao-gang
    Zhao, Fang-fang
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [6] Surgical approaches for open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sharma, Siddhartha
    John, Rakesh
    Dhillon, Mandeep S.
    Kishore, Kamal
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2018, 49 (08): : 1381 - 1391
  • [7] Three-dimensional printing combined with open reduction and internal fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of acetabular fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tu Dong-Peng
    Yu Yi-Kang
    Liu Zhen
    Zhang Wen-Kai
    Fan Xin
    Xu Chao
    中华创伤杂志(英文版), 2021, 24 (03) : 159 - 168
  • [8] Three-dimensional printing combined with open reduction and internal fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of acetabular fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tu, Dong-Peng
    Yu, Yi-Kang
    Liu, Zhen
    Zhang, Wen-Kai
    Fan, Xin
    Xu, Chao
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 24 (03) : 159 - 168
  • [9] External fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of Complex Tibial Plateau Fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tripathy, Sujit Kumar
    Varghese, Paulson
    Panigrahi, Sibasish
    Panda, Bijnya Birajita
    Srinivasan, Anand
    Sen, Ramesh Kumar
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2021, 55 (05) : 444 - 456
  • [10] Comparison between open reduction with internal fixation to circular external fixation for tibial plateau fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Zheng
    Wang, Ping
    Li, Li
    Li, Changshu
    Lu, He
    Ou, Chuanshuang
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09):