Randomized controlled trial of a midwife-delivered brief smoking cessation intervention in pregnancy

被引:108
|
作者
Hajek, P
West, R
Lee, A
Foulds, J
Owen, L
Eiser, JR
Main, N
机构
[1] Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, London E1 2AD, England
[2] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Sch Med, London SW17 0RE, England
[3] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[4] Hlth Dev Agcy, London, England
[5] Univ Exeter, Exeter, Devon, England
[6] Univ London Kings Coll, Inst Psychiat, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96348511.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of a brief smoking cessation intervention with pregnant women practicable routinely by midwives. Design. Midwives were randomized to deliver the experimental intervention or usual care. The 10-15-minute intervention was based on brief counselling, written materials, arrangements for continuing self-help support and feedback on expired-air carbon monoxide levels. The intervention was tailored to the women's needs: those who did not want to stop smoking received a brief motivational intervention, those who wanted to stop received an intervention designed to assist them and those that had stopped recently (recent ex-smokers) received a relapse prevention intervention. Setting. Booking interviews with pregnant women in nine hospital and community trusts. Subjects. A total of 1120 pregnant women in the third month of pregnancy (249 recent ex-smokers and 871 current smokers). Main outcome measures. Three indicators of biochemically validated abstinence were collected. Continuous abstinence for at least 3 months prior to delivery, point prevalence abstinence immediately post-delivery, and continuous abstinence from 3 months pre-delivery to 6 months post-delivery. Results. Only a small proportion of the women who would have been eligible to take part in the trial were actually recruited by 178 recruiting midwives, with lack of time being cited as the main barrier. The intervention and usual care groups differed in post-delivery point prevalence abstinence rates for recent ex-smokers (65% vs. 53%, p<0.05, one-tailed), but not in other outcome measures. Overall, 54% of 'recent ex-smokers' at booking and 7% of 'current smokers' at booking had been abstinent for at least 3 months at the time of delivery, and 23% and 3%, respectively, were still abstinent by the time the child was 6 months old (i.e. 12 months post-intervention). Smoking status at follow-up was predicted by dependence indexed by time to first cigarette in the morning. Conclusions. A brief 'one-off' smoking cessation intervention by midwives does not seem to be a practicable or effective method of helping pregnant smokers to stop. Other options such as tailored self-help materials and telephone counselling and other specialist treatments should be examined. Current smoking cessation rates in pregnancy are very low.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 494
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention during pregnancy
    Panjari, M
    Bishop, S
    Astbury, J
    Rice, G
    Docry, J
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 39 (03): : 312 - 317
  • [2] A randomized controlled trial of smoking cessation intervention in pregnancy in an academic clinic
    Hartmann, KE
    Thorp, JM
    PahelShort, L
    Koch, MA
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (04): : 621 - 626
  • [3] A school nurse-delivered adolescent smoking cessation intervention: A randomized controlled trial
    Pbert, Lori
    Osganian, Stavroula K.
    Gorak, Diane
    Druker, Susan
    Reed, George
    O'Neill, Katherine M.
    Sheetz, Anne
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 43 (04) : 312 - 320
  • [4] Brief Smoking Cessation Intervention in Relation to Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Thomsen, Thordis
    Tonnesen, Hanne
    Okholm, Mette
    Kroman, Niels
    Maibom, Annerikke
    Sauerberg, Marie-Louise
    Moller, Ann M.
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (11) : 1118 - 1124
  • [5] Impact of a Brief Motivational Smoking Cessation Intervention The Get PHIT Randomized Controlled Trial
    McClure, Jennifer B.
    Ludman, Evette J.
    Grothaus, Louis
    Pabiniak, Chester
    Richards, Julie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (02) : 116 - 123
  • [6] Effects of a brief pain and smoking cessation intervention in adults with chronic pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Hooten, W. M.
    LaRowe, Lisa R.
    Zale, Emily L.
    Ditre, Joseph W.
    Warner, David O.
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2019, 92 : 173 - 179
  • [7] Brief intervention on maternal smoking:: a randomized controlled trial
    Yilmaz, G
    Karacan, C
    Yöney, A
    Yilmaz, T
    CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 32 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [8] The effectiveness of a nurse-delivered smoking-cessation intervention for cardiac patients: A randomized, controlled trial
    Chan, SSC
    Lam, TH
    Lau, CP
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2005, 7 (04) : 692 - 692
  • [9] A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention for pregnant adolescents
    Albrecht, Susan A.
    Caruthers, Donna
    Patrick, Thelma
    Reynolds, Maureen
    Salamie, Denise
    Higgins, Linda W.
    Braxter, Betty
    Kim, Yookyung
    Mlynarchek, Sara
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2006, 55 (06) : 402 - 410
  • [10] Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Tappin, David
    Bauld, Linda
    Purves, David
    Boyd, Kathleen
    Sinclair, Lesley
    MacAskill, Susan
    McKell, Jenniffer
    Friel, Brenda
    McConnachie, Alex
    de Caestecker, Linda
    Tannahill, Carol
    Radley, Andrew
    Coleman, Tim
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2015, 70 (05) : 297 - 298