Measuring project management inputs throughout capital project delivery

被引:25
|
作者
Yun, Sungmin [1 ]
Choi, Jiyong [2 ]
Oliveira, Daniel P. [1 ]
Mulva, Stephen P. [1 ]
Kang, Youngcheol [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Construct Ind Inst, 3925 West Braker Lane R4500, Austin, TX 78729 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, 301,E Dean Keeton St Stop C1752, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ Seoul, Dept Global Construct, 163 Seoulsiripdae Ro, Seoul 02504, South Korea
关键词
Project management input; Phase-based benchmarking; Leading indicator; Project organization; 10-10; program; CONSTRUCTION SAFETY PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS; BENCHMARKING; INDUSTRY; SUSTAINABILITY; INTEGRATION; TEAMS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Despite continuous efforts into benchmarking over the last decades, few have focused on management efforts of project organizations who are involved in managing the capital project. This study presents a phase-based framework and 10 input measures for measuring project management efforts in a capital project. The measures are planning, organizing, leading, controlling, design efficiency, human resources, quality, sustainability, supply chain, and safety. This study quantifies and assesses the inputs and further sorts the results by industry sectors and project phases. The analyses show that traditional functions tend to have more consistent implementation than construction-specific functions. The results indicate that infrastructure sector tends to exert fewer and less consistent efforts than building and industrial sectors. This study contributes a new benchmarking framework and is the first to quantify project management inputs of a capital project systematically. Additionally, phase-focused and phase-wide benchmarking applications of the input measures are also discussed and provided. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1167 / 1182
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MEASURING PERFORMANCE IN CAPITAL PROJECT-MANAGEMENT
    SNOWDON, M
    [J]. LONG RANGE PLANNING, 1980, 13 (04) : 51 - 55
  • [2] Measuring Progress and Productivity in Model-Driven Engineering for Capital Project Delivery
    Garcia, Gustavo
    Golparvar-Fard, Mani
    de la Garza, Jesus M.
    Fischer, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 147 (04)
  • [3] Capital Project Management Systems
    Verveniotis, Paul
    [J]. POWER ENGINEERING, 2010, 114 (11) : 54 - +
  • [4] Advancing capital project management
    Grandage, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC BUDGETING ACCOUNTING & FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 33 (05) : 618 - 634
  • [5] Measuring the value of project management
    Patah, Leandro Alves
    de Carvalho, Marly Monteiro
    [J]. PICMET '07: PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS: MANAGEMENT OF CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, : 2038 - 2042
  • [6] Consider Alternative Capital Project Delivery Methods
    Reichenberger, Joseph C.
    [J]. JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 112 (10): : 76 - 78
  • [7] Intellectual capital within the project management
    Latas, Robert
    Walasek, Dariusz
    [J]. XXV POLISH - RUSSIAN - SLOVAK SEMINAR -THEORETICAL FOUNDATION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 153 : 384 - 391
  • [8] Project management is a capital investment process
    Anderson, DK
    Merna, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2005, 21 (04) : 173 - 178
  • [9] The Berkeley Project Management Process Maturity Model: Measuring the value of project management
    Kwak, YH
    Ibbs, CW
    [J]. EMS - 2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2000 IEEE ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SOCIETY, 2000, : 1 - 5
  • [10] Understanding Project Management: Skills and Insights for Successful Project Delivery
    Waheed, Zehra
    [J]. FACILITIES, 2016, 34 (7-8) : 493 - 494