Short- and long-term outcomes in Bankart repair vs. conservative treatment for first-time anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:29
|
作者
Alkhatib, Nedal [1 ]
Abdullah, Abdullah Saad A. [2 ]
AlNouri, Mason [3 ]
Alzobi, Osama Zied Ahmad [4 ]
Alkaramany, Eslam [4 ]
Ishibashi, Yasuyuki [3 ]
机构
[1] Mercy Hlth Cincinnati, Sports Med & Orthopaed Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Div Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Hirosaki Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
[4] Hamad Med Corp, Orthopaed Surg Dept, Doha, Qatar
关键词
First-time; shoulder; dislocation; Bankart repair; surgery; conservative; treatment; IMMEDIATE ARTHROSCOPIC STABILIZATION; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; INSTABILITY; IMMOBILIZATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; REHABILITATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.032
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: First-time anterior shoulder dislocations are associated with a high rate of residual instability. Therefore, many surgeons support initial Bankart repair surgery over conservative management to address this issue. However, the optimal treatment remains controversial because of uncertainty regarding long-term surgical outcomes. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the short- and long-term rates of residual instability following Bankart repair or conservative management after a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect databases were accessed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Bankart repair to conservative management. RoB (Risk of Bias) 2 was used to check study quality. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines were followed in assessing primary outcomes. The inverse-variance method for continuous variables and the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables was used. Results: A total of 348 patients from 6 RCTs published across 8 articles, with a mean age of 23.7 years, were included. Bias was graded low in 3 studies, some concerns in 3 studies, and high in 2 studies. In the short term (2-3 years), surgery lowered recurrent instability (risk ratio [RR] 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08, 0.27; I-2 = 0%; P <.0001). Similar findings were seen in the long term (5-12 years) (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.14, 0.39; I-2 = 0%; P <.0001). No difference was observed in return to sport (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.91, 1.52; I-2 = 78%; P =.21). Initial surgery lowered subsequent stabilization surgery in the short (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.09, 0.43; I-2 = 0%; P <.0001) and long term (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07, 0.39; I-2 = 25%; P <.0001). Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores did not differ in the short term (MD, 2.54, 95% CI -0.51, 5.59; I-2 = 48%; P =.1) but were higher in the surgical group at long-term follow-up. Patient satisfaction was also higher with surgery (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.4, 2.2; I-2 = 88%; P <.0001). Certainty of evidence was low for only 1 long-term outcome measure. Conclusion: Bankart repair surgery for first-time anterior shoulder dislocation results in a large reduction in the risk of recurrent shoulder instability and subsequent stabilization surgery in both short- (2-3 years) and long-term (5-12 years) follow-up intervals. Additionally, slight improvements in overall patient satisfaction and WOSI score can be seen at long-term follow-up. However, surgical intervention failed to significantly improve the rate of return to sport when compared with conservative management. (C) 2022 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1751 / 1762
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus conservative treatment for first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Bin
    Hong, Jianqiao
    Zhu, Hanxiao
    Yan, Shigui
    Wu, Haobo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 28 (01)
  • [2] Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus conservative treatment for first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bin Hu
    Jianqiao Hong
    Hanxiao Zhu
    Shigui Yan
    Haobo Wu
    European Journal of Medical Research, 28
  • [3] Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Conservative Management for First-Time Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Manjunath, Amit K.
    Bloom, David A.
    Pauzenberger, Leo
    Mullett, Hannan
    Alaia, Michael J.
    Strauss, Eric J.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (09): : 2526 - 2532
  • [4] Shoulder Stabilization Versus Immobilization for First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Level 1 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Belk, John W.
    Wharton, Benjamin R.
    Houck, Darby A.
    Bravman, Jonathan T.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    Mayer, Braden
    Noonan, Thomas J.
    Seidl, Adam J.
    Frank, Rachel M.
    McCarty, Eric C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (06): : 1634 - 1643
  • [5] Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the acute anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohammed Adam
    Ahmed Khalil Attia
    Abduljabbar Alhammoud
    Osama Aldahamsheh
    Mohammed Al Ateeq Al Dosari
    Ghalib Ahmed
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 2413 - 2422
  • [6] Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the acute anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Adam, Mohammed
    Attia, Ahmed Khalil
    Alhammoud, Abduljabbar
    Aldahamsheh, Osama
    Al Dosari, Mohammed Al Ateeq
    Ahmed, Ghalib
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (10) : 2413 - 2422
  • [7] OPERATIVE VERSUS NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT FOLLOWING FIRST-TIME ANTERIOR SHOULDER DISLOCATION A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    van Spanning, Sanne H.
    Verweij, Lukas P. E.
    Priester-Vink, Simone
    van Deurzen, Derek F. P.
    van den Bekerom, Michel P. J.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [8] Short- vs. Long-Course Antibiotic Treatment for Acute Streptococcal Pharyngitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Holm, Anna Engell
    Llor, Carl
    Bjerrum, Lars
    Cordoba, Gloria
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2020, 9 (11): : 1 - 16
  • [9] Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lin, Zhong
    Jiang, Zheng-Li
    Chen, Dan-Yang
    Chen, Min-Fang
    Chen, Li-Hua
    Zhou, Peng
    Xia, Ai-Xiao
    Zhu, Yan-Wu
    Jin, Hui
    Ge, Qiang-Qiang
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (50)
  • [10] Long-Term Remote vs. Conventional Monitoring of Pacemakers: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Antônio Silva Menezes Junior
    André Rivera
    Isabele Ayumi Miyawaki
    Douglas Mesadri Gewehr
    Bárbara Nascimento
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2023, 25 : 1415 - 1424