Multi-criteria decision making for sustainability assessment of boxboard production: A life cycle perspective considering water consumption, energy consumption, GHG emissions, and internal costs

被引:27
|
作者
Man, Yi [1 ]
Han, Yulin [1 ]
Liu, Yue [2 ]
Lin, Ruojue [2 ]
Ren, Jingzheng [2 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, State Key Lab Pulp & Paper Engn, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; Papermaking industry; Boxboard; Life cycle analysis; Sustainability; PAPER-INDUSTRY; WORST METHOD; VIRGIN PULP; WOOD PULP; TOPSIS; WASTE; PAPERMAKING; PERFORMANCE; SELECTION; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109860
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Papermaking is a capital-intensive industry that requires a high consumption of plant fibers, energy, and water. Previous sustainability assessments of papermaking industry primarily focused on separate evaluations for multiple criteria without the integration for criteria and could not compare the overall priority of the production alternatives. The life cycle sustainability for the most representative boxboard production is analyzed as a case study in this work. Life cycle water consumption, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and internal costs are selected as the assessment criteria. The two multi-criteria decision-making methods are applied to integrate the above criteria to obtain the sustainability sequence under different production pathways. When the papermaking enterprises are regarded as decision-makers, the alternative using waste paper as raw material to manufacture boxboard is the most sustainable, following by mixed fiber. The sustainability sequence of the alternatives using wood and straw as raw materials is controversial due to the different calculation models. Changing the proportion of raw materials and the criteria weights might adjust sustainability sequence of the alternatives.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainability assessment of CCS technologies by combining multi-criteria decision making with life cycle assessment
    Weichen Li
    Di Xu
    Shimin Ding
    Lichun Dong
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2023, 28 (5) : 479 - 494
  • [2] Sustainability assessment of CCS technologies by combining multi-criteria decision making with life cycle assessment
    Li, Weichen
    Xu, Di
    Ding, Shimin
    Dong, Lichun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (05): : 479 - 494
  • [3] LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING IN BRIDGE DESIGN: A REVIEW
    Navarro, Ignacio Javier
    Penades-Pla, Vicent
    Martinez-Munoz, David
    Rempling, Rasmus
    Yepes, Victor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 26 (07) : 690 - 704
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision making for the prioritization of energy systems under uncertainties after life cycle sustainability assessment
    Ren, Jingzheng
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2018, 16 : 45 - 57
  • [5] Biofuels for a more sustainable future: Life cycle sustainability assessment and multi-criteria decision making
    Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan
    Asheri-Gafsheh, Elnaz
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2024, 102
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of energy consumption and GHG emissions of olefins production from alternative resources in China
    Xiang, Dong
    Yang, Siyu
    Li, Xiuxi
    Qian, Yu
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 90 : 12 - 20
  • [7] Life-cycle analysis of energy consumption and GHG emissions of aluminium production in China
    Peng, Tianduo
    Ou, Xunmin
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Gehua
    [J]. INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY TRANSITIONS, 2019, 158 : 3937 - 3943
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of the energy consumption and GHG emissions of state-of-the-art automotive battery cell production
    Degen, Florian
    Schuette, Marius
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 330
  • [9] Life Cycle Analysis with Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A review of approaches for the sustainability evaluation of renewable energy technologies
    Campos-Guzman, Veronica
    Socorro Garcia-Cascales, M.
    Espinosa, Nieves
    Urbina, Antonio
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 104 : 343 - 366
  • [10] A Comprehensive Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Sustainable Material Selection Considering Life Cycle Assessment Method
    Ma, Fangwu
    Zhao, Ying
    Pu, Yongfeng
    Li, Jinhang
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 58338 - 58354