The Value of the 8th Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging on the Selection of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy for T1-2N1 Breast Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Jun [1 ]
Zhong, Xiao-Rong [2 ,3 ]
Luo, Ting [2 ,3 ]
Xiang, Zhong-Zheng [1 ]
Zeng, Yuan-Yuan [1 ]
Yang, Tian [1 ]
Zheng, Hong [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Lei [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, State Key Lab Biotherapy, Dept Head & Neck Oncol,Dept Radiat Oncol Canc Ctr, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Breast Dis Ctr, Canc Ctr, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Multi Lab Breast Dis, State Key Lab Biotherapy,Innovat Ctr Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; ANATOMIC STAGE; POSITIVE NODES; RISK; IRRADIATION; RECURRENCE; RADIATION; SURGERY; SYSTEM; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1155/2022/7550323
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Objective. The value of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in T1-2N1M0 breast cancer remains unclear. Our cohort study is aimed at evaluating the PMRT guiding value of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological prognostic staging system in the era of modern systematic treatment in this disease. Methods and Materials. Patients diagnosed with pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer between 2008 and 2018 in West China Hospital, Sichuan University were included. Locoregional-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) were defined as endpoints. The propensity score matching (PSM), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the Cox multivariable model were used for data analysis. Results. We identified 1,615 patients with T1-2N1M0 breast cancer, and 44.9% (n=744) of them were treated with PMRT. With a median follow-up of 76 months, 46 (2.8%) recurrences, 96 (5.9%) deaths, and 80 (5.0%) breast cancer-related deaths occurred. The 5-year LRFS, DMFS, DFS, BCSS, and OS were 98.6%, 95.3%, 93.7%, 96.5%, and 96.0%, respectively. PMRT could not improve 5-year LRFS, DMFS, DFS, BCSS, and OS compared with non-PMRT neither before nor after PSM in the era of contemporary systemic treatment. ROC curve showed that the 8th pathological prognostic staging had better discriminative ability compared with the 7th anatomical staging [the area under the curve (AUC) 0.653 vs. 0.546, P < 0.001]. In the anatomical staging system, PMRT had comparable 5-year BCSS in comparison with non-PMRT both in stages IIA (97.4% vs. 96.8%, P=0.799) and IIB (95.3% vs. 97.0%, P=0.071). When stratified according to the pathological staging, PMRT was associated with better 5-year BCSS in stage IIB (97.1% vs. 90.7%, P=0.039), while not in stages IA, IB, IIA, and IIIA. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PMRT was a significantly protective factor for BCSS in stage IIB (HR 0.331, 95% CI: 0.100-0.967, P=0.044). Conclusion. The new staging could better select high-risk patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer for radiotherapy compared with the 7th staging, and PMRT might be exempted except the 8th staging of IIB in the era of contemporary systemic therapy in this disease.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging for young breast cancer patients
    Zhou, Juan
    Lei, Jian
    Wang, Jun
    Lian, Chen-Lu
    Hua, Li
    Yang, Li-Chao
    Wu, San-Gang
    [J]. AGING-US, 2020, 12 (08): : 7549 - 7560
  • [2] Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer's pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy
    Wu, San-Gang
    Wang, Jun
    Lian, Chen-Lu
    Lei, Jian
    Hua, Li
    Lin, Qin
    Chen, Yong-Xiong
    He, Zhen-Yu
    [J]. BREAST, 2020, 51 : 2 - 10
  • [3] The prognostic value of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in triple-negative breast cancer
    Li, J. P.
    Zhang, X. M.
    Zhang, Y. S.
    Zheng, L. H.
    Liu, Y. J.
    [J]. NEOPLASMA, 2019, 66 (05) : 810 - 817
  • [4] Prognostic Value of Prognostic Staging System Based on the 8th Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual in Different Molecular Subtypes of Invasive Breast Cancer
    Jang, Nuri
    Choi, Jung Eun
    Kang, Su Hwan
    Bae, Young Kyung
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 31 : 77 - 78
  • [5] Prognostic Value of Prognostic Staging System Based on the 8th Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual in Different Molecular Subtypes of Invasive Breast Cancer
    Jang, Nuri
    Choi, Jung Eun
    Kang, Su Hwan
    Bae, Young Kyung
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 77 - 78
  • [6] A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer
    Lee, Sae Byul
    Sohn, Guiyun
    Kim, Jisun
    Chung, Il Yong
    Lee, Jong Won
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Ko, Beom Seok
    Son, Byung Ho
    Ahn, Sei-Hyun
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 169 (02) : 257 - 266
  • [7] A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer
    Sae Byul Lee
    Guiyun Sohn
    Jisun Kim
    Il Yong Chung
    Jong Won Lee
    Hee Jeong Kim
    Beom Seok Ko
    Byung Ho Son
    Sei-Hyun Ahn
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 169 : 257 - 266
  • [8] Changes to skin cancer staging in American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition
    Demir, Ahmet
    Unverdi, Omer Faruk
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 28 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [9] Assessment of the Prognostic Staging System of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition for Breast Cancer: Comparisons with the Conventional Anatomic Staging System
    Kim, Eun Jin
    Park, Hyung Seok
    Kim, Jee Ye
    Kim, Seung Il
    Cho, Young-Up
    Park, Byeong-Woo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2020, 23 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [10] Lymphnode staging update in the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition cancer staging manual
    Olawaiye, Alexander B.
    Mutch, David G.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 150 (01) : 7 - 8