Direct volumetric flow cytometric quantitation of CD34+stem and progenitor cells

被引:7
|
作者
Gutensohn, K. [1 ,2 ]
Nikolitsis, A. [1 ]
Gramatzki, M. [3 ]
Spitzer, D. [3 ]
Buwitt-Beckmann, U. [3 ]
Humpe, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Transfus Med, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] AescuLab Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Kiel, Dept Med 2, Div Stem Cell Transplantat & Immunotherapy, Kiel, Germany
关键词
bead technology; CD34; flow cytometry; single platform; volumetric analysis; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM; ENUMERATION; STANDARDIZATION; SINGLE; BLOOD; TRANSPLANTATION; FLUOROCHROME; PROTOCOLS; COUNTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3148.2012.01155.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: In this study, we compared a classic single-platform (SP) method applying beads for enumeration of CD45+ or CD34+ cells with a new device allowing direct volumetric measurements of stem and progenitor cells. Background: Following apheresis and cyropreservation, the precise enumeration of CD34+ cells as key parameter of graft quality is mandatory for the clinical course after transplantation. Currently, flow cytometry with SP technique represents the gold standard for such determinations. Methods/Materials: Fresh samples, 14 from mobilised peripheral blood (PB), 9 from apheresis products (AP) and 13 samples from frozen-thawed (FT) haematopoietic progenitor cell grafts, were analysed for CD34+ cells, CD45+ cells, and in frozen-thawed samples for viability by a bead-based flow cytometric method and in parallel by a direct, volumetric flow cytometric method. Results: Comparison of CD34+ analyses revealed a significant correlation (P < 0.01) for each material between both techniques with r = 0.95 (PB), r = 0.933 (AP) and r = 0.929 (FT). Also, for analysis of CD45+ cells mu L-1, the measured numbers evaluated with the different techniques did not significantly differ for all three materials analysed. In frozen-thawed samples, the analysis of viability was comparable for both techniques. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that a direct volumetric analysis of CD34+ cells mu L-1 or CD45+ cells mu L-1 is feasible. This technique represents a simple and economical approach for standardisation of progenitor and stem cell analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 210
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitation of CD34+stem and progenitor cells: comparison of a new direct volumetric flow cytometric method with the standard, beads-based flow cytometric method
    Humpe, A.
    Gutensohn, K.
    Nikolitsis, A.
    Spitzer, D.
    Buwitt-Beckmann, U.
    Gramatzki, M.
    [J]. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 47 : S232 - S232
  • [2] Quantitation of CD34+ haematopoietic stem cells by flow cytometric analysis
    Peng, L
    Yang, J
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 51 : A163 - A163
  • [3] Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
    Gratama, JW
    Orfao, A
    Barnett, D
    Brando, B
    Huber, A
    Janossy, G
    Johnsen, HE
    Keeney, M
    Marti, GE
    Preijers, F
    Rothe, G
    Serke, S
    Sutherland, DR
    Van der Schoot, CE
    Schmitz, G
    Papa, S
    [J]. CYTOMETRY, 1998, 34 (03): : 128 - 142
  • [4] Flow Cytometric Enumeration of Viable CD34(+) Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
    Odendahl, M.
    Tonn, T.
    [J]. TRANSFUSIONSMEDIZIN, 2012, 2 (03) : 145 - 152
  • [5] HLA EXPRESSION ON CD34+STEM CELLS: IS A FLOW CYTOMETRIC CROSSMATCH A GOOD GATEKEEPER FOR MISMATCHED HEMATOPOIETIC CELL TRANSPLANTION?
    Bettinotti, Maria P.
    Lucas, Donna P.
    Ghiaur, Gabriel
    Jackson, Annette M.
    Gladstone, Douglas E.
    [J]. HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 79 : 35 - 35
  • [6] FLOW CYTOMETRIC QUANTITATION OF CD34+ STEM-CELLS IN PERIPHERAL STEM-CELL APHERESIS PRODUCTS
    PIRRUCCELLO, SJ
    COLLINS, MM
    JACKSON, JD
    LETHEBY, BA
    KESSINGER, A
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY, 1994, 22 (08) : 758 - 758
  • [7] Zebrafish In-Vivo Screening for Compounds Amplifying Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells: - Preclinical Validation in Human CD34+Stem and Progenitor Cells
    Arulmozhivarman, Guruchandar
    Kraeter, Martin
    Wobus, Manja
    Friedrichs, Jens
    Bejestani, Elham Pishali
    Mueller, Katrin
    Lambert, Katrin
    Alexopoulou, Dimitra
    Dahl, Andreas
    Stoeter, Martin
    Bickle, Marc
    Shayegi, Nona
    Hampe, Jochen
    Stoelzel, Friedrich
    Brand, Michael
    von Bonin, Malte
    Bornhaeuser, Martin
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [8] MULTIPARAMETER FLOW-CYTOMETRIC QUANTITATION OF CIRCULATING CD34+-CELLS - CORRELATION TO THE QUANTITATION OF CIRCULATING HEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITOR CELLS BY INVITRO COLONY-ASSAY
    SERKE, S
    SAUBERLICH, S
    HUHN, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1991, 77 (04) : 453 - 459
  • [9] USE OF FLOW CYTOMETRIC CD34 ANALYSIS TO QUANTIFY HEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITOR CELLS
    FRITSCH, G
    BUCHINGER, P
    PRINTZ, D
    [J]. LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 1993, 10 (06) : 443 - 451
  • [10] NEW DELINEATION OF HUMAN CD34+STEM/ PROGENITOR CELL HIERARCHICAL ORGANIZATION
    Anjos-Afonso, Fernando
    Buettner, Florian
    Bonnet, Dominique
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 53 : S42 - S42