Early post-operative removal of urethral catheter in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with epidural analgesia - A prospective pilot clinical study

被引:24
|
作者
Coyle, David [1 ]
Joyce, Kenneth M. [1 ]
Garvin, Joseph T. [1 ]
Regan, Mark [1 ]
McAnena, Oliver J. [1 ]
Neary, Peter M. [1 ]
Joyce, Myles R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Galway, Dept Surg, Galway, Ireland
关键词
Post-operative urinary retention; Colorectal; Urinary catheter; Detrusor; Epidural analgesia; Colectomy; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SUPRAPUBIC BLADDER DRAINAGE; URINARY RETENTION; ENHANCED RECOVERY; RECTAL RESECTION; INFECTION; OUTCOMES; PROGRAM; CANCER; COLON;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Urethral catheter (UC) removal is often delayed following colorectal resection due to the perceived increased risk of post-operative urinary retention (POUR) in patients with post-operative epidural analgesia (POEA). We aimed to determine if UC removal at 48 h, irrespective of ongoing POEA use, altered the risk of POUR and other morbidities associated with urethral catheterisation and immobility. Methods: We performed a prospective randomised controlled pilot clinical study. Eligible patients were randomised to an experimental arm, SG1 (UC removal 48 h post-operatively), or a control arm, SG2 (UC removed following cessation of POEA). Rates of POUR, urinary tract infection (UTI), pulmonary complications and surgical site infection (SSI) were recorded. Forty-four patients were recruited (SG1: n = 22; SG2: n = 22). Results: No females developed POUR, while it occurred in three males (20%) in SG1 and 2 males (22.2%) in SG2. All patients who developed POUR had undergone rectal resection. Males in SG1 were not at significantly increased risk of POUR compared to those in SG2 (R.R 0.875, p = 1). No patient developed UTI post-operatively. The rate of pulmonary complications (SG1: n = 2; SG2: n = 3, p = 0.229) and SSI (SG1: n = 5; SG2: n = 2, p = 0.146) were similar between both study arms. Discussion: Males undergoing rectal surgery appear to be at increased risk of developing POUR in the presence of epidural analgesia, independent of the timing of UC removal. Conclusions: All female patients undergoing colorectal resection and male patients undergoing colonic resection may have their urethral catheter removed at 48 h irrespective of use of POEA. (C) 2015 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 98
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Peer review report 1 on Early post-operative removal of urethral catheter in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with epidural analgesia - a prospective pilot clinical study
    Caglikulekci, Mehmet
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 13 : S17 - S17
  • [2] Early post-operative removal of urethral catheter in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with epidural analgesia-a single-centre prospective randomised controlled clinical trial
    Coyle, D.
    Joyce, K.
    Garvin, J. T.
    Regan, M.
    McAnena, O. J.
    Neary, P.
    Joyce, M. R.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 183 : S23 - S23
  • [3] A prospective study of early removal of the urethral catheter after colorectal surgery in patients having epidural analgesia as part of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme
    Stubbs, B. M.
    Badcock, K. J. M.
    Hyams, C.
    Rizal, F. E.
    Warren, S.
    Francis, D.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (06) : 733 - 736
  • [4] Clinical Study on Epidural Injected Lappaconitine for Post-operative Analgesia
    陈敏光
    王其豪
    林玉冰
    陈孔利
    林华阳
    林玮
    林芩
    刘飞
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 1996, (01) : 26 - 29
  • [5] Evaluation of a Post-Operative Rehabilitation Program in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Pilot Study
    Nusca, Sveva Maria
    Parisi, Attilio
    Mercantini, Paolo
    Gasparrini, Marcello
    Pitasi, Francesco Antonio
    Lacopo, Alessandra
    Colonna, Vincenzo
    Stella, Giulia
    Cerulli, Claudia
    Grazioli, Elisa
    Tranchita, Eliana
    Santoboni, Flavia
    Latini, Eleonora
    Trischitta, Donatella
    Vetrano, Mario
    Visco, Vincenzo
    Pavan, Antonio
    Vulpiani, Maria Chiara
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (11)
  • [6] A clinical study in epidural injection with lappaconitine compound for post-operative analgesia
    Min-guang Chen
    Qi-hao Wang
    Wei Lin
    Yu-bing Lin
    Kong-li Chen
    Fei Liu
    Qin Lin
    Hua-yang Lin
    Hong-da Cai
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, 1997, 3 (4): : 257 - 260
  • [7] A Clinical Study in Epidural Injection with Lappaconitine Compound for Post-Operative Analgesia
    陈敏光
    王其豪
    林伟
    林玉冰
    陈孔利
    刘飞
    林芩
    林华阳
    蔡宏达
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 1997, (04) : 257 - 260
  • [8] Priapism in an infant caused by post-operative analgesia through epidural catheter
    Pelavski, AD
    Suescun, MC
    Conesa, A
    Aranda, M
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 50 (05) : 632 - 632
  • [9] ORAL ANALGESIA FOR POST-OPERATIVE COLORECTAL PATIENTS
    Buchan, S.
    Williams, L.
    Bamford, R.
    Wood, A.
    Mackey, P.
    [J]. GUT, 2015, 64 : A391 - A391
  • [10] Post-operative continuous epidural analgesia in patients with cerebral palsy undergoing hip and major lower extremity surgery
    Roy, DR
    Weidner, N
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 1997, 100 (03) : 483 - 484