A comparison of process alternatives for energy-efficient bioethanol downstream processing

被引:17
|
作者
Granjo, Jose F. O. [1 ]
Nunes, Dinis S. [1 ]
Duarte, Belmiro P. M. [1 ,2 ]
Oliveira, Nuno M. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Dept Chem Engn, CIEPQPF, Rua Silvio Lima,Polo 2, P-3030790 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Polytech Inst Coimbra, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, ISEC, Rua Pedro Nunes, P-3030199 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Gasohol; Ethanol recovery; Process optimization; Techno-economic analysis; Heat exchanger network optimal design; EXTRACTIVE DISTILLATION; SEPARATION TECHNOLOGIES; AZEOTROPIC DISTILLATION; ETHANOL DEHYDRATION; GASOLINE; WATER; RECOVERY; INTEGRATION; OPTIMIZATION; SOLUBILITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116414
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Ethanol is a biofuel used to reduce fossil fuel consumption and the greenhouse gases emissions associated with road transportation. Bioethanol is obtained from diluted fermentation broths, and various technological solutions are available for its recovery and dehydration prior marketing, usually blended with gasoline (gasohol). This work explores an ethanol purification approach where gasoline is used as a separation agent towards the direct production of gasohol. This alternative replaces part of the purification steps in common ethanol downstream processing, providing significant reductions on the operating costs required to produce bioethanol. Two configurations for the direct manufacture of E10 gasohol are analyzed. Process I incorporates a liquid-liquid extraction stage, while Process II uses an extractive distillation arrangement. The energy requirements of both configurations are compared against each other and with a benchmark process where ethanol dehydration is carried out by molecular sieves (Process MS). The results show that both alternatives are energetically advantageous since they can be optimized to reduce their equivalent energy requirements by 33% compared to Process MS, for ethanol concentrations in the fermentation broths between 2 and 10 wt%. Further improvements could be achieved with a multi-effect distillation system in the ethanol concentration step, allowing total energy savings of 68% relatively to the benchmark, for a fermentation broth containing 5 wt% ethanol. Estimated ethanol separation costs are approximately $0.15/kg ethanol, making these technological alternatives especially attractive for large scale industrial application.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of Process Alternatives for Energy-Efficient Bioethanol Downstream Processing
    Nunes, Dinis S.
    Granjo, Jose F. O.
    Duarte, Belmiro P. M.
    Oliveira, Nuno M. C.
    29TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT A, 2019, 46 : 391 - 396
  • [2] Energy-efficient bioethanol recovery process using deep eutectic solvent as entrainer
    Seong Chan Lee
    Hyeon Woo Oh
    Hee Chul Woo
    Young Han Kim
    Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2023, 13 : 15815 - 15826
  • [3] Energy-efficient bioethanol recovery process using deep eutectic solvent as entrainer
    Lee, Seong Chan
    Oh, Hyeon Woo
    Woo, Hee Chul
    Kim, Young Han
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2023, 13 (17) : 15815 - 15826
  • [4] Gasoline Preblending for Energy-Efficient Bioethanol Recovery
    Stacey, Neil T.
    Hadjitheodorou, Aristoklis
    Glasser, David
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (10) : 8286 - 8291
  • [5] ENERGY-EFFICIENT PROCESS
    BANNAR, R
    FOOD ENGINEERING, 1980, 52 (04): : 63 - 66
  • [7] Analysis of energy-efficient complex distillation options to purify bioethanol
    Hernandez, Salvador
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 31 (04) : 597 - 603
  • [8] Renewable Energy with Energy-Efficient Distributed Processing for IoT
    Li, Jiaqi
    Hwang, Seung-Hoon
    2022 IEEE VTS ASIA PACIFIC WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYMPOSIUM, APWCS, 2022, : 160 - 164
  • [9] Energy-efficient process upgrades bitumen
    不详
    HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2007, 86 (04): : 29 - 29
  • [10] Comparison and design of energy-efficient approximate multiplier schemes for image processing by CNTFET
    Tavakkoli, Elmira
    Shokri, Shayan
    Aminian, Mahdi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS, 2024, 111 (05) : 813 - 834