Hoarding disorder and the legal system: A comparative analysis of South African and Dutch law

被引:2
|
作者
Cramer, Richard [1 ]
Vols, Michel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Mineral Law Africa, Kramer Law Bldg,Middle Campus, ZA-7700 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Legal Methods, POB 716, NL-9700 AS Groningen, Netherlands
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Hoarding; Disability; Reasonable accommodation; Functional comparative analysis; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Eviction; ACCOMMODATION; RIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.08.004
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Hoarding is an internationally recognised disability. Those who suffer from hoarding behaviour can be comfortably brought within the definition of disability found in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and should be provided with "reasonable accommodation" where doing so does not place an unjustified burden on others. However, hoarding also poses a threat to public health, and hoarders' behaviour may infringe on the rights of their neighbours and landlords. Thus, through their behaviour, hoarders may ultimately come into conflict with various areas of law, including neighbour law, housing law as well as administrative law. This article examines how hoarding may be addressed by the law in both South Africa and the Netherlands. It seeks to answer to what extent hoarders are provided with "reasonable accommodation" when their behaviour brings them into conflict of the law in these two jurisdictions. It also takes cognisance of the need to balance the provision of "reasonable accommodation" with the rights of neighbours and landlords. Finally, it seeks to assess which of the two jurisdictions provides the most balanced approach to handling hoarding, in light of the need for therapeutic jurisprudence. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 123
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条