Efficient and Automated Generation of Orthogonal Atmospheres for the Characterization of Low-Cost Gas Sensor Systems in Air Quality Monitoring

被引:2
|
作者
Tancev, Georgi [1 ]
Ackermann, Andreas [1 ]
Schaller, Gerald [1 ]
Pascale, Celine [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Metrol METAS, CH-3003 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Air quality monitoring; calibration; design of experiments; gas sensor; low cost; metrology; CALIBRATION METHODS; FIELD CALIBRATION; AVAILABLE SENSORS; PERFORMANCE; NO2; CLUSTER; DESIGN; OZONE; PART; CITY;
D O I
10.1109/TIM.2022.3198747
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This article presents a compact continuous-flow automaton for the metrological characterization of an array of low-cost gas sensor systems (up to 17 devices) used in air quality monitoring. The automaton readily generates homogeneous gas mixtures of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen monoxide (NO) and dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O-3) in the parts-per-billion range (ppb, nmol mol(-1)) that are stable, that is, dispersion of 1 pph (NO, NO2, O-3) and 9 ppb (CO), with response times of 2 min (CO, NO, O-3) and 30 min (NO2). The resulting mixtures, which are traceable to the International System of Units (SI) due to the usage of calibrated high-grade reference instruments, can be humidified [0%-60% relative humidity (RH)] and, in addition, the devices under test (DUTs) can be heated (to temperatures between 5 degrees C and 30 degrees C) to systematically simulate different atmospheric environments. The application of fractional factorial designs makes the protocol efficient and leads to orthogonal variables. With the presented installation, ten low-cost gas sensor systems are calibrated and an uncertainty estimation is performed. The average values of the relative standard uncertainties across all DUTs are estimated as 52% (CO), 61% (NO), 22% (NO2), and 21% (O-3).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 1
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Calibration of Low-cost Gas Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring
    Margaritis, Dimitris
    Keramydas, Christos
    Papachristos, Ioannis
    Lambropoulou, Dimitra
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (11)
  • [2] Low-cost multispecies air quality sensor
    Wang, C. M.
    Esse, B. D.
    Lewis, A. C.
    [J]. AIR POLLUTION XXIII, 2015, 198 : 105 - 116
  • [3] On the Security and Data Integrity of Low-Cost Sensor Networks for Air Quality Monitoring
    Luo, Lan
    Zhang, Yue
    Pearson, Bryan
    Ling, Zhen
    Yu, Haofei
    Fu, Xinwen
    [J]. SENSORS, 2018, 18 (12)
  • [4] The Relocation Problem of Field Calibrated Low-Cost Sensor Systems in Air Quality Monitoring: A Sampling Bias
    Tancev, Georgi
    Pascale, Celine
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (21) : 1 - 14
  • [5] Development of Air Quality Boxes Based on Low-Cost Sensor Technology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
    Gaebel, Paul
    Koller, Christian
    Hertig, Elke
    [J]. SENSORS, 2022, 22 (10)
  • [6] Deployment and Evaluation of a Network of Open Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Systems
    Schneider, Philipp
    Vogt, Matthias
    Haugen, Rolf
    Hassani, Amirhossein
    Castell, Nuria
    Dauge, Franck R.
    Bartonova, Alena
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (03)
  • [7] Advancing air quality monitoring: A low-cost sensor network in motion - Part I
    Correia, Carolina
    Santana, Pedro
    Martins, Vania
    Mariano, Pedro
    Almeida, Alexandre
    Almeida, Susana Marta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 360
  • [8] Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration: A Survey and Critical Analysis
    Concas, Francesco
    Mineraud, Julien
    Lagerspetz, Eemil
    Varjonen, Samu
    Liu, Xiaoli
    Puolamaki, Kai
    Nurmi, Petteri
    Tarkoma, Sasu
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SENSOR NETWORKS, 2021, 17 (02)
  • [9] Low-Cost Urban Air Quality Monitoring with Mosaic
    Guan, Gaoyang
    Chen, Yuan
    Guo, Kai
    Gao, Yi
    Dong, Wei
    [J]. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2016,
  • [10] A low-cost computer and sensors for air quality monitoring
    Sun, Vanessa
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 3 (05) : 293 - 293