Research on the Pricing Strategy of "Internet plus " Recycling Platforms in a Two-Sided Network Environment

被引:6
|
作者
Zhu, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Management Engn, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Dev Inst Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Chang Wang Sch Honors, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
关键词
two-sided market; inter-group network externality; closed loop supply chain; game theory; remanufacturing; COMPETITION; SERVICE;
D O I
10.3390/su12031001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
"Internet +" platform recycling is an emerging business model with two-sided market characteristics. How to meet the needs of consumers and manufacturers and how to formulate a reasonable two-sided pricing structure have become challenges faced by recycling trading platforms. Based on the theory of a two-sided market, the pricing mechanism of a monopoly platform and a model of competing platforms are studied. Consequently, a sensitivity analysis and comparison analysis are conducted, giving a pricing decision and the optimal profit of closed-loop supply chain systems. Finally, through a numerical simulation analysis, the impacts of the inter-group network externalities, service differentiation, and the matching efficiency on e-waste recycling prices and profits are obtained. The result indicates that the influences of inter-group network externalities on monopoly platforms and competing platforms are different; thus, platforms should choose pricing strategies according to their own market position. The pricing of the two types of platform is inversely proportional to the time-sensitive coefficient of the two platforms, while it is directly proportional to the matching efficiency. The improvement of the differentiation of service will increase the pricing of the platform for single-homing manufacturers without affecting the multi-homing consumers, and profits will increase accordingly.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms
    Hagiu, Andrei
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03): : 720 - 737
  • [2] An Analysis of Two-Sided Internet Pricing
    Li, Sicong
    Ma, Richard T. B.
    [J]. 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICCS), 2014, : 167 - 171
  • [3] Asymmetric Pricing Game in Two-sided Platforms
    Dou, Yifan
    Xiao, Yongbo
    Chen, Jian
    [J]. 2009 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 521 - 526
  • [4] Pricing and Service Strategies for Two-sided Platforms
    Lin, Xiaogang
    Chen, Chuanying
    Lin, Zhaozhan
    Zhou, Yongwu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2019, 28 (03) : 299 - 316
  • [5] Pricing and Service Strategies for Two-sided Platforms
    Xiaogang Lin
    Chuanying Chen
    Zhaozhan Lin
    Yongwu Zhou
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2019, 28 : 299 - 316
  • [6] Two-Sided Platforms: Product Variety and Pricing Structures
    Hagiu, Andrei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2009, 18 (04) : 1011 - 1043
  • [7] The Research of Corporation Pricing Strategy Based on Two-sided Markets Characteristics
    Lin Haiying
    [J]. 2013 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCE (ICASS 2013), VOL 1, 2013, : 456 - 460
  • [8] Network effects in online two-sided market platforms: A research note
    Li, Shengli
    Liu, Yipeng
    Bandyopadhyay, Subhajyoti
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 49 (02) : 245 - 249
  • [9] Internet regulation, two-sided pricing, and sponsored data
    Jullien, Bruno
    Sand-Zantman, Wilfried
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2018, 58 : 31 - 62
  • [10] Pricing strategies of two-sided platforms considering privacy concerns
    Duan, Yongrui
    Liu, Peng
    Feng, Yixuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2022, 64