A retailer-supplier supply chain model with trade credit default risk in a supplier-Stackelberg game

被引:49
|
作者
Wu, Chengfeng [1 ]
Zhao, Qiuhong [2 ]
Xi, Menghao [3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, 99 Songling Rd, Qingdao 266061, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 37 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Disaster Prevent Sci & Technol, Dept Econ & Management, Sanhe 065201, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Trade credit; Supply chain; Default risk; Supplier-Stackelberg; Delay in payments; ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY; LINEAR-TREND DEMAND; PERMISSIBLE DELAY; LOT-SIZE; INVENTORY MODEL; EOQ MODEL; PAYMENTS; POLICIES; BUYER; COORDINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2017.03.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to formulate a retailer-supplier uncooperative replenishment model with demand and default risk are functions of the trade credit period for determining the optimal trade credit period in a supplier-Stackelberg game. Firstly, we present optimal results for the decentralized decision and the centralized decision without trade credit. Secondly, we derive the existence and uniqueness conditions of the optimal solutions for the retailer and the supplier. Moreover, we develop a set of theorems and corollaries to determine the optimal solutions. Finally, we provide an example and sensitivity analysis to illustrate the proposed strategy and optimal solutions. Sensitivity analysis reveals that the total profit of the supply chain under a supplier-Stackelberg game is greater than that observed under a centralized decision only if the optimal trade credit period is not too short. This finding also reveals that the size of the trade credit period, demand, retailer's profit and supplier's profit have strong relationships with the increasing demand coefficient, wholesale price, default risk coefficient and production cost. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 575
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A loss-averse retailer-supplier supply chain model under trade credit in a supplier-Stackelberg game
    Wu, Chengfeng
    Liu, Xin
    Li, Annan
    [J]. MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2021, 182 : 353 - 365
  • [2] Two retailer-supplier supply chain models with default risk under trade credit policy
    Wu, Chengfeng
    Zhao, Qiuhong
    [J]. SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [3] Determination of the optimal trade credit policy: a supplier-Stackelberg model
    Zhou, Y-W
    Zhou, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2013, 64 (07) : 1030 - 1048
  • [4] Stackelberg Game of Buyback Policy in Supply Chain with a Risk-Averse Retailer and a Risk-Averse Supplier Based on CVaR
    Zhou, Yanju
    Chen, Qian
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Wang, Zongrun
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [5] Research on Stackelberg game between the supplier and the retailer under VMI
    Cai Jianhu
    Zhou Gengui
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH WEST LAKE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMB, 2006, : 1410 - 1413
  • [6] The Incentive Model in Supply Chain with Trade Credit and Default Risk
    Cheng, Hong
    Su, Yingsheng
    Yan, Jinjiang
    Wang, Xianyu
    Li, Mingyang
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2019, 2019
  • [7] Integrated Supply Chain of Supplier and Retailer for Stochastic Demand
    Tiwari, Sunil
    Jaggi, Chandra K.
    Sana, Shib Sankar
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL MODELLING AND ANALYSIS, 2018, 23 (04) : 582 - 595
  • [8] Review on Default risk of Trade Credit in the Supply Chain
    Qin, Juanjuan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, EDUCATION, HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (EMEHSS 2017), 2017, 86 : 241 - 244
  • [9] THE INVENTORY MODEL UNDER SUPPLIER'S PARTIAL TRADE CREDIT POLICY IN A SUPPLY CHAIN SYSTEM
    Chung, Kun-Jen
    Ting, Pin-Shou
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2015, 11 (04) : 1175 - 1183
  • [10] Optimal Trade Credit Policy for Supplier under Asymmetric Information in the Supply Chain
    程红
    汪贤裕
    苏应生
    [J]. Journal of Donghua University(English Edition), 2011, 28 (04) : 439 - 444