Obstetrics anal sphincter injury and repair technique: A review

被引:7
|
作者
Temtanakitpaisan, Teerayut [1 ]
Bunyacejchevin, Suvit [1 ]
Koyama, Masayasu [2 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Female Pelv Med, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Osaka City Grad Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Osaka 5458585, Japan
关键词
external anal sphincter; dystocia; fecal incontinence; obstetrical injury; RISK-FACTORS; VAGINAL DELIVERY; CLINICAL-TRIAL; TEARS; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; 3RD-DEGREE; DISRUPTION; DAMAGE; WOMEN; 3RD;
D O I
10.1111/jog.12630
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The Urogynecology Committee of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (AOFOG) has held seminars and workshops on various urogynecological problems in each country in the Asia-Oceania area in order to encourage young obstetricians and gynecologists. In 2013, we organized the operative seminar for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in which we prepared porcine models to educate young physicians in a hands-on workshop at the 23rd Asian and Oceanic Congress of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Bangkok, Thailand. Laceration of the anal sphincter mostly occurs during vaginal delivery and it can develop into anal sphincter deficiency, which causes fecal incontinence, if an appropriate suture is not performed. OASIS has become an important issue, especially in developing countries. The prevalence of OASIS of more than the third degree is around 5% in primary parous women and the frequency is higher when detected by ultrasonographic evaluation. Several risk factors, such as macrosomia, instrumental labor, perineal episiotomy and high maternal age, have been recognized. In a society where pregnant women are getting older, OASIS is becoming a more serious issue. An intrapartum primary appropriate stitch is important, but the 1-year outcome of a delayed operation after 2 weeks postpartum is similar. A randomized controlled study showed that overlapping suture of the external sphincter is better than that of end-to-end surgical repair. The Urogynecology Committee of the AOFOG would like to continue with educative programs about the appropriate therapy for OASIS.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 333
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Functional and physiological outcomes following repair of obstetrics anal sphincter injury. A case
    Dickinson, K. J.
    Pickersgill, P.
    Anwar, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 11 (10) : 1137 - 1140
  • [2] Repair of an old anal sphincter injury
    Ras, L.
    Jeffery, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 : 196 - 196
  • [3] Overlapping repair in patients with anal sphincter injury
    Demirbas, Sezai
    Atay, Vedat
    Sucullu, Ilker
    Filiz, A. Ilker
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2008, 17 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [4] Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury
    Fernando, Ruwan J.
    Sultan, Abdul H.
    Kettle, Christine
    Thakar, Ranee
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (12):
  • [5] Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury
    Fernando, R.
    Sultan, A. H.
    Kettle, C.
    Thakar, R.
    Radley, S.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (03):
  • [6] Episcissors-60™ and obstetrics anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Divakova, Olga
    Khunda, Aethele
    Ballard, Paul A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (03) : 605 - 612
  • [7] Episcissors-60™ and obstetrics anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Olga Divakova
    Aethele Khunda
    Paul A. Ballard
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31 : 605 - 612
  • [8] Obstetric anal sphincter injury: How to avoid, how to repair: A literature review
    Power, D
    Fitzpatrick, M
    O'Herlihy, C
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2006, 55 (03): : 193 - 200
  • [9] ANAL-SPHINCTER INJURY - MANAGEMENT AND RESULTS OF PARKS SPHINCTER REPAIR
    BROWNING, GGP
    MOTSON, RW
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1984, 199 (03) : 351 - 357
  • [10] Repair of the anal sphincter
    Kamm, MA
    UPDATE GASTROENTEROLOGY 1996, 1996, : 175 - 181