Axial performance of RC columns with glass-fiber grids as peripheral hoops

被引:1
|
作者
Hwang, Y. H. [1 ]
Yang, K. H. [2 ]
Choi, Y. S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kyonggi Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Grad Sch, Suwon, South Korea
[2] Kyonggi Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Suwon, South Korea
[3] 4M Corp, Res Team, Naju, South Korea
关键词
Glass-fiber grids; hoop; column; axial ductility; confinement; transverse reinforcement index; CONCRETE COLUMNS; STRENGTH; DUCTILITY; CONFINEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/24705314.2019.1708050
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The present study aimed to investigate the significance and limitation for the practical application of high-flexibility glass-fiber (GF) grids as an alternative of conventional steel hoops in reinforced concrete (RC) columns. The application of GF grids was also tested for the jacket section to retrofit the deficient columns of which configuration is impractical due to the interference of the existing column. Five virgin columns and two RC jacketed columns were tested under concentric axial loads. Main test parameters were the arrangement type and amount of wrapped GF grids with the combination of conventional steel hoops. The effectiveness of GF grids on confining concrete was examined through the assessment of axial ductility ratios of columns and stress-strain curves of confined concrete. All columns exhibited the tensile fracture of GF grids immediately after the peak strength of columns, which accelerated the crushing of core concrete and buckling of longitudinal reinforcement. Thus, the axial ductility ratios measured in the present columns with GF grids were commonly lower than those of the tied columns with conventional steel hoops at the same transverse reinforcement index. Overall, a more elaborate treatment is required for improving the tensile strength and elongation capacity of GF grids to apply for an alternative of steel hoops in tied columns.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 39
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficiency of glass-fiber reinforced-polymer (GFRP) discrete hoops and bars in concrete columns under combined axial and flexural loads
    Hadhood, Abdeldayem
    Mohamed, Hamdy M.
    Ghrib, Faouzi
    Benmokrane, Brahim
    COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2017, 114 : 223 - 236
  • [2] Seismic performance assessment of RC columns with interlocking hoops
    Kim, Tae-Hoon
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 49 (04) : 579 - 589
  • [3] On the Structural Performance of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Columns with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Bars and Hoops
    Raza, Ali
    Rashedi, Ahmad
    Rafique, Umer
    Hossain, Nazia
    Akinyemi, Banjo
    Naveen, Jesuarockiam
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [4] AXIAL CRUSHING OF GLASS-FIBER POLYESTER COMPOSITE CONES
    PRICE, JN
    HULL, D
    COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 28 (03) : 211 - 230
  • [5] BUCKLING BEHAVIOR OF GLASS-FIBER REINFORCED POLYESTER PULTRUDED COLUMNS
    Srinivasan, Malur N.
    Chayakul, Vanchak
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION 2011, VOL 3, 2012, : 385 - 389
  • [6] Field trial for asphalt pavements reinforced with geosynthetics and behavior of glass-fiber grids
    Zou, Wei-Lie
    Wang, Zhao
    Zhang, Hui-Ming
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2007, 21 (05) : 361 - 367
  • [7] PERFORMANCE OF GLASS-FIBER ANTISCATTER DEVICES AT MAMMOGRAPHIC ENERGIES
    FAHRIG, R
    MAINPRIZE, JG
    ROBERT, N
    ROGERS, A
    YAFFE, MJ
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (08) : 1277 - 1282
  • [8] Axial performance of RC columns strengthened with different jacketing methods
    Hwang, Yong-Ha
    Yang, Keun-Hyeok
    Mun, Ju-Hyun
    Kwon, Seung-Jun
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 206
  • [9] Stress-rupture performance of glass-fiber reinforced composites
    Greenwood, ME
    DESIGN OF STRUCTURES 2002: BRIDGES, OTHER STRUCTURES, AND HYDRAULICS AND HYDROLOGY, 2002, (1814): : 213 - 218
  • [10] COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF GLASS-FIBER HI-VOL FILTERS
    WITZ, S
    SMITH, MM
    MOORE, AB
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 33 (10): : 988 - 991