Task-specific postures in low-seam underground coal mining

被引:9
|
作者
Moore, Susan M. [1 ]
Pollard, Jonisha P. [1 ]
Nelson, Mary Ellen [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Inst Occupat Safety & Hlth, Off Mine Safety & Hlth Res, Human Factors Branch, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Knee; Kneeling; Crawling; Posture; Mining; Coal; FOOT ROTATION; KNEE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; IMPLEMENTATION; ERGONOMICS; DISORDERS; NUTRITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2012.01.002
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine low-seam mine worker exposure to various postures as they pertain to job classifications and job tasks. Sixty-four mine workers from four low-seam coal mines participated. The mine workers reported the tasks they were required to complete and the two postures they used most frequently to perform them. They were provided with a schematic of postures from which to select. The two postures reported most frequently were identified for each task along with the job classification of the workers performing the tasks. Of the 18 tasks reported, over two thirds were performed by at least two different job classifications and over one third were performed by four or more job classifications. Across tasks, the postures used appeared to vary greatly. However, when grouped by job classification, the most frequently reported posture across all job classifications was kneeling near full flexion. Operating the continuous miner was associated with frequent squatting and was likely used because it affords great mobility, allowing operators to move quickly to avoid hazards. However, for environments with a restricted vertical height such as low-seam mining, the authors recommend squatting be avoided as data demonstrates that large amounts of femoral rollback and high muscle activity for the extensors when performing lateral lifts in this posture. Kneeling near full flexion was reported as the most frequently used posture by all job classifications and was likely due to the fact that it requires the least amount of muscle activity to maintain and has reduced pressures at the knee. However, the authors recommend this posture be avoided when performing lateral lifting tasks. Like squatting, kneeling near full flexion results in increased femoral rollback and may increase the stresses applied to the meniscus. Unlike lateral lifting, maintaining a static posture results in knee loading and muscle activity such that the mine worker should consider kneeling near full flexion and sitting on their heels. Although kneeling near full flexion is associated with injuries, there are benefits to this posture that are realized when statically kneeling (minimal muscle activity, allows worker to maintain an upright torso in low heights, and decreased loading at the knee). However, cartilage is avascular and nourished by synovial fluid. Therefore, one should frequently rotate between postures, assuming a more upright kneeling posture when possible and frequently fully flexing and extending the knee allowing nutrients to the cartilage. Relevance to industry: In 2009, over one fourth of underground coal mines that produced coal in the United States were considered low seam with an average working height of <109.2 cm (MSHA, 2009) restricting workers to their knees. Data exists regarding the biomechanical implications of kneeling postures and demonstrates the possibility of detrimental consequences to varying degrees for each posture. With each posture posing a different level of exposure to musculoskeletal disorder risk factors, it is essential to determine the postures mine workers use to perform their job tasks and how their postural options are restricted by the low-seam underground mining environment. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An analysis of injury claims from low-seam coal mines
    Gallagher, Sean
    Moore, Susan
    Dempsey, Patrick G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2009, 40 (03) : 233 - 237
  • [2] Metabolic analysis of support personnel in low-seam coal-mines
    Freivalds, Andris
    Bise, Christopher J.
    [J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1991, 8 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [3] HYDRAULICS FOR LOW SEAM COAL MINING
    TETI, JJ
    [J]. HYDRAULICS & PNEUMATICS, 1971, 24 (10): : 65 - &
  • [4] Mining Task-Specific Lines of Code Counters
    Ochodek, Miroslaw
    Durczak, Krzysztof
    Nawrocki, Jerzy
    Staron, Miroslaw
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 100218 - 100233
  • [5] Future trends for underground thick seam coal mining in Australia
    Hebblewhite, BK
    [J]. MASSMIN 2000, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 2000 (07): : 869 - 873
  • [6] ON THE DESIGN FEATURES OF UNDERGROUND MULTIPLE GASSY COAL SEAM MINING
    Kazanin, O. I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINING INSTITUTE, 2015, 215 : 38 - 45
  • [7] Analysis of alternatives for using cable bolts as primary support at two low-seam coal mines
    Esterhuizen Gabriel S.
    Tulu Ihsan B.
    [J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2016, 26 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [8] Analysis of alternatives for using cable bolts as primary support at two low-seam coal mines
    Gabriel, Esterhuizen S.
    Ihsan, Tulu B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 26 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [9] Impact of Underground Coal Seam Mining on Stability and Slippage of the Loess Slope
    Zhao, Bingchao
    Guo, Yaxin
    Wang, Wei
    He, Shenglin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [10] Fracture Zonation for Overlying Strata in Underground Mining of Shallow Coal Seam
    Fan, Gangwei
    Zhang, Dongsheng
    Zhou, Lei
    [J]. ADVANCES IN INDUSTRIAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2012, 594-597 : 2607 - 2611