Consumer willingness to pay for sustainability attributes in beer: A choice experiment using eco-labels

被引:20
|
作者
Staples, Aaron J. [1 ,2 ]
Reeling, Carson J. [1 ]
Widmar, Nicole J. Olynk [1 ]
Lusk, Jayson L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr Econ, 403 W State St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Food & Resource Econ, 446 W Circle Dr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
beer; choice experiment; consumer preference; environmental sustainability; willingness to pay; WINE PRODUCTION; PREFERENCES; PERCEPTIONS; IMPACT; ENERGY; TASTE;
D O I
10.1002/agr.21655
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Commercial and regional brewers are increasingly investing in environmental sustainability equipment that reduces input use, operating costs, and environmental impacts. These technologies often require prohibitively high upfront costs. One potential solution for these brewers is to market their product as sustainable and charge a premium to offset some of the costs. We undertake a stated preference choice experiment targeting a nationally representative sample of beer buyers and elicit preferences for multiple attributes related to environmental sustainability in beer. We find that, on average, beer buyers are willing to pay $0.70/six-pack for beer produced using water and wastewater reduction technologies, $0.85 for carbon reduction practices, and $0.98 for landfill diversion practices, though water sustainability practices appeal to a largest share of beer buyers. We also find that preferences for sustainability attributes are widely distributed among beer drinkers, largely irrespective of sociodemographic characteristics. The positive price premiums across sustainability attributes suggest beer buyers value sustainable brewing, and brewers could attract new consumers by simultaneously communicating their commitment to sustainability and differentiating their product [EconLit Citations: D12, L66, M31].
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 612
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Consumer willingness to pay for eco-labels in China: A choice experiment approach
    Zhang, Xuemei
    Yin, Haitao
    Zhao, Rui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT ANALYTICS, 2021, 8 (04) : 673 - 692
  • [2] Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes
    Van Loo, Ellen J.
    Caputo, Vincenzina
    Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.
    Seo, Han-Seok
    Zhang, Baoyue
    Verbeke, Wim
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 118 : 215 - 225
  • [3] Consumer Preference and Willingness to Pay for Rice Attributes in China: Results of a Choice Experiment
    Fang, Pingping
    Zhou, Zhou
    Wang, Hua
    Zhang, Lixia
    [J]. FOODS, 2024, 13 (17)
  • [4] Habit spillovers or induced awareness: Willingness to pay for eco-labels of rice in China
    Zhou, Jiehong
    Liu, Qing
    Mao, Rui
    Yu, Xiaohua
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2017, 71 : 62 - 73
  • [5] Eco-Labels: Modeling the Consumer Side
    van't Veld, Klaas
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 12, 2020, 12 : 187 - 207
  • [6] Eco-labels: a sustainability performance in benchmarking?
    Proto, Maria
    Malandrino, Ornella
    Supino, Stefania
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2007, 18 (06) : 669 - 683
  • [7] Willingness-to-pay for whale tour attributes using a choice experiment
    Lee, Choong-Ki
    Mjelde, James W.
    Kim, Tae-Kyun
    Lee, Eunjung
    Choi, Youngjoon
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2019, 24 (06) : 606 - 617
  • [8] Green and Simple: Disclosures on Eco-labels Interact with Situational Constraints in Consumer Choice
    Ni Choisdealbha, Aine
    Lunn, P. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY, 2020, 43 (04) : 699 - 722
  • [9] Green and Simple: Disclosures on Eco-labels Interact with Situational Constraints in Consumer Choice
    Á. Ní Choisdealbha
    P. D. Lunn
    [J]. Journal of Consumer Policy, 2020, 43 : 699 - 722
  • [10] Consumer willingness to pay for fair-trade attributes of goat meat in Kenya: A choice experiment analysis
    Otieno, David Jakinda
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS-AFJARE, 2020, 15 (04): : 372 - 386