Energy efficiency in China: optimization and comparison between hydropower and thermal power

被引:8
|
作者
Wang, Ruo-Mei [1 ]
Tian, Ze [2 ]
Ren, Fang-rong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Sch Business, Focheng West Rd 8, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Sch Business, Jinling North Rd 200, Changzhou 213022, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy efficiency; Hydropower; Thermal power; CO2; Super-efficiency slack-based measure model; Meta-Frontier; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; ECO-EFFICIENCY; DEA; CONSUMPTION; PLANTS; INDUSTRY; MODEL; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1186/s13705-021-00311-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background The energy generation efficiencies of thermal power and hydropower, which are the two main forces of electric power in China, are important factors affecting the energy conservation, emission reduction, and green development of the country's whole power industry. Methods Considering regional differences and multiple efficient decision-making units (DMUs), this research uses the meta-Frontier super-efficiency slack-based measure (meta-SE-SBM) undesirable model to comprehensively evaluate the efficiencies of hydropower and thermal power generation in China. The CO2 emissions of thermal power generation are taken as the undesirable output. Results The ranking of the average meta-efficiency of thermal power generation in China is Eastern China > Central China > Western China, and all regions show an upward trend. However, the ranking of the average meta-efficiency of hydropower generation is Western China > Central China > Eastern China, and all these regions present a downward trend. In 2017, the technology gap ratio (TGR) values for the thermal power generation efficiency of the eastern and western regions showed a rising trend, while that for the central region showed a declining trend. The TGR values of the hydropower generation efficiency of the western region continued to increase, while those of the central and eastern regions decreased. The development trends of the TGR values of the thermal power or hydropower generation efficiencies of the three regions were not consistent with each other, indicating that technological convergence has not been achieved. In the three regions, the technology gaps in hydropower have slightly expanded, but the technology gaps in thermal power have gradually narrowed. The undesirable output CO2 of the thermal power energy efficiency of the three regions is in a surplus, and the generation of hydropower in the eastern and central regions is insufficient. Conclusions The government and power industry managers should fully consider regional heterogeneity in the efficiency of hydropower and thermal power to reduce the technology gap in China. The thermal power industry is relatively mature, but its CO2 emissions should be controlled. The hydropower industry needs further policy support to promote an efficiency improvement in it under the condition of resource endowments.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy efficiency in China: optimization and comparison between hydropower and thermal power
    Ruo-Mei Wang
    Ze Tian
    Fang-rong Ren
    [J]. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 11
  • [2] Comprehensive Cost Analysis and Comparison of Thermal Power, Hydropower and Wind Power in China
    Qin, Junsong
    Niu, Dongxiao
    Zhong, Yashan
    Wu, Meiqiong
    [J]. Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education, 2016, 53 : 296 - 299
  • [3] Comparison of misallocation between the Chinese thermal power and hydropower electricity industries
    Yu, Chin-Hsien
    Zhao, Jinsong
    Qin, Ping
    Wang, Shinn-Shyr
    Lee, Wen-Chieh
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2022, 116
  • [4] ENERGY EFFICIENCY COMPARISON BETWEEN GEOTHERMAL POWER SYSTEMS
    Luo, Chao
    Zhao, Jun
    Gong, Yulie
    Wang, Yongzhen
    Ma, Weibin
    [J]. THERMAL SCIENCE, 2017, 21 (06): : 2633 - 2642
  • [5] Competition or complementarity ? The hydropower and thermal power nexus in China
    Wang, Yongpei
    Yan, Weilong
    Zhuang, Shangwen
    Zhang, Qian
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 138 : 531 - 541
  • [6] Benefits of power exchange between hydropower and thermal power systems
    Eriksen, PB
    [J]. HYDROPOWER IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 2001, : 61 - 65
  • [7] COMPARISON OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS FOR THERMAL POWER PLANTS IN CHINA
    Zhang, Wei
    Xia, Xiaohua
    Li, Jinyi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 13 (05): : 1221 - 1227
  • [8] Total Factor Energy Efficiency of China's Thermal Power Industry
    Feng, Ying
    Lu, Ching-Cheng
    Lin, I-Fang
    Yang, An-Chi
    Lin, Po-Chun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [9] Collaborative thermal management of power battery and passenger cabin for energy efficiency optimization
    Ma, Jing
    Liu, Ahao
    Zhang, Peng
    Chen, Yisong
    Cai, Yaomin
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 293
  • [10] Energy Efficiency Improvement of Auxiliary Power Equipment in Thermal Power Plant through Operational Optimization
    Mandi, Rajashekar
    Yaragatti, Udaykumar
    [J]. IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER ELECTRONICS, DRIVES AND ENERGY SYSTEMS (PEDES 2012), 2012,