A comparison of four methods for PCR inhibitor removal

被引:50
|
作者
Hu, Qingqing [1 ]
Liu, Yuxuan [1 ]
Yi, Shaohua [1 ]
Huang, Daixin [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Forens Med, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
关键词
Forensic DNA analysis; PCR inhibition; PowerClean (R) DNA Clean-Up; DNA IQ (TM); Phenol-Chloroform; Chelex (R)-100; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; DNA EXTRACTION; SPIN COLUMNS; AMPLIFICATION; SAMPLES; RECOVERY; KIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.12.001
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Biological samples collected from the crime scenes often contain some compounds that can inhibit the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The removal of PCR inhibitors from the extracts prior to the PCR amplification is vital for successful forensic DNA typing. This paper aimed to evaluate the ability of four different methods (PowerClean (R) DNA Clean-Up kit, DNA IQ (TM) System, Phenol-Chloroformextraction and Chelex (R)-100 methods) to remove eight commonly encountered PCR inhibitors including: melanin, humic acid, collagen, bile salt, hematin, calciumions, indigo and urea. Each of these PCR inhibitors was effectively removed by the PowerClean (R) DNA Clean-Up kit and DNA IQ (TM) System as demonstrated by generating more complete short tandemrepeat (STR) profiles from the cleaned up inhibitor samples than from the raw inhibitor samples. The Phenol-Chloroform extraction and Chelex (R)-100 methods, however, could only remove some of eight PCR inhibitors. Our results demonstrated that the PowerClean (R) DNA Clean-Up kit and DNAIQ (TM) System were very effective for the removal of known PCR inhibitors that are routinely found in DNA extracts from forensic samples. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 97
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Free Light Chain Removal by Four Blood Purification Methods
    Kanayama, Kyoko
    Ohashi, Atsushi
    Hasegawa, Midori
    Kondo, Fumiko
    Yamamoto, Yoshihiro
    Sasaki, Mayu
    Hayashi, Hiroki
    Kato, Masao
    Hattori, Ryoko
    Yamashita, Hiroshi
    Arai, Jiro
    Ishii, Junichi
    Emi, Nobuhiko
    Yuzawa, Yukio
    THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2011, 15 (04) : 394 - 399
  • [2] Comparison of four PCR methods for efficient detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in routine diagnostics
    Seiringer, Peter
    Pritsch, Michael
    Flores-Chavez, Maria
    Marchisio, Edoardo
    Helfrich, Kerstin
    Mengele, Carolin
    Hohnerlein, Stefan
    Bretzel, Gisela
    Loescher, Thomas
    Hoelscher, Michael
    Berens-Riha, Nicole
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2017, 88 (03) : 225 - 232
  • [3] Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded brackets with four methods of adhesive removal
    Yassaei, S.
    Aghili, H.
    KhanPayeh, E.
    Moghadam, M. Goldani
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 29 (05) : 1563 - 1568
  • [4] Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded brackets with four methods of adhesive removal
    S. Yassaei
    H. Aghili
    E. KhanPayeh
    M. Goldani moghadam
    Lasers in Medical Science, 2014, 29 : 1563 - 1568
  • [5] A COMPARISON OF FOUR SEROLOGICAL METHODS AND TWO RT-PCR ASSAYS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND SURVEILLANCE OF ZIKA
    Balmaseda, Angel
    Victor Zambrana, Jose
    Collado, Damaris
    Gonzalez, Karla
    Garcia, Nadezna
    Saborio, Saira
    Cerpas, Cristhiam
    Nunez, Andrea
    Elizondo, Douglas
    Waggoner, Jesse J.
    Corti, Davide
    Burger-Calderon, Raquel
    Kuan, Guillermina
    Harris, Eva
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2017, 97 (05): : 439 - 440
  • [6] Detection of four clarithromycin resistance point mutations in Helicobacter pylori: Comparison of real-time PCR and PCR-RFLP methods
    Kargar M.
    Doosti A.
    Ghorbani-Dalini S.
    Comparative Clinical Pathology, 2013, 22 (5) : 1007 - 1013
  • [7] DNA extraction using the QIAsymphony: Evaluation of PCR inhibitor removal
    Castella, V.
    Kummer, D.
    Gehrig, C.
    Hall, D.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL GENETICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2011, 3 (01) : E69 - E70
  • [8] Comparison of four kinds of coagulants for the removal of picophytoplankton
    Aktas, Tugrul Selami
    Takeda, Fumihiko
    Maruo, Chikako
    Fujibayashi, Megumu
    Nishimura, Osamu
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2013, 51 (16-18) : 3547 - 3557
  • [10] Comparison of four methods that measure hydroxyproline
    Bruce, H. L.
    Chan, A.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 : 366 - 366