Performance improvement of machine learning models via wavelet theory in estimating monthly river streamflow

被引:25
|
作者
Wang, Kegang [1 ]
Band, Shahab S. [2 ]
Ameri, Rasoul [2 ]
Biyari, Meghdad [2 ]
Hai, Tao [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Hsu, Chung-Chian [5 ]
Hadjouni, Myriam [6 ]
Elmannai, Hela [7 ]
Chau, Kwok-Wing [8 ]
Mosavi, Amir [9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Ankang Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Ankang, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Future Technol Res Ctr, Touliu, Taiwan
[3] Baoji Univ Arts & Sci, Sch Comp Sci, Baoji, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Teknol MARA, Inst Big Data Analyt & Artificial Intelligence IB, Shah Alam, Malaysia
[5] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Int Grad Inst Artificial Intelligence, Dept Informat Management, Touliu, Yunlin, Taiwan
[6] Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Dept Comp Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[7] Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Dept Informat Technol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[8] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[9] Obuda Univ, John Von Neumann Fac Informat, Budapest, Hungary
[10] Univ Publ Serv, Inst Informat Soc, Budapest, Hungary
[11] Slovak Univ Technol Bratislava, Inst Informat Engn Automat & Math, Bratislava, Slovakia
关键词
River streamflow; wavelet; machine learning; hybrid models; estimation; DATA-DRIVEN MODEL; LINEAR-REGRESSION; NEURAL-NETWORK; PREDICTION; TIME; SIMULATION; FORECAST; ACCURACY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1080/19942060.2022.2119281
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
River streamflow is an essential hydrological parameters for optimal water resource management. This study investigates models used to estimate monthly time-series river streamflow data at two hydrological stations in the USA (Heise and Irwin on Snake River, Idaho). Five diverse types of machine learning (ML) model were tested, support vector machine-radial basis function (SVM-RBF), SVM-Polynomial (SVM-Poly), decision tree (DT), gradient boosting (GB), random forest (RF), and long short-term memory (LSTM). These were trained and tested alongside a conventional multiple linear regression (MLR). To improve the estimation and model performance, hybrid models were designed by coupling the models with wavelet theory (W). The models performance was assessed using root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R-2), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and Willmott's index (WI). A side-by-side performance assessment of the stand-alone and hybrid models revealed that the coupled models exhibit better estimates of monthly river streamflow relative to the stand-alone ones. The statistical parameter values for the best model (W-LSTM4) during the test phase was RMSE = 36.533 m(3)/s, MAE = 26.912 m(3)/s, R-2 = 0.947, NSE = 0.946, WI = 0.986 (Heise station), and RMSE = 33.378 m(3)/s, MAE = 24.562 m(3)/s, R-2 = 0.952, NSE = 0.951, WI = 0.987 (Irwin station).
引用
收藏
页码:1833 / 1848
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ayana, Omer
    Kanbak, Deniz Furkan
    Keles, Muemine Kaya
    Turhan, Evren
    [J]. ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2023, 71 (06) : 2905 - 2922
  • [2] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ömer Ayana
    Deniz Furkan Kanbak
    Mümine Kaya Keleş
    Evren Turhan
    [J]. Acta Geophysica, 2023, 71 : 2905 - 2922
  • [3] Monthly streamflow forecasting for the Hunza River Basin using machine learning techniques
    Khan, Sunaid
    Khan, Mehran
    Khan, Afed Ullah
    Khan, Fayaz Ahmad
    Khan, Sohail
    Fawad, Muhammad
    [J]. WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 18 (08) : 1959 - 1969
  • [4] Enhancing Monthly Streamflow Prediction Using Meteorological Factors and Machine Learning Models in the Upper Colorado River Basin
    Thota, Saichand
    Nassar, Ayman
    Boubrahimi, Soukaina Filali
    Hamdi, Shah Muhammad
    Hosseinzadeh, Pouya
    [J]. HYDROLOGY, 2024, 11 (05)
  • [6] Wavelet regression and wavelet neural network models for forecasting monthly streamflow
    Partal, Turgay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2017, 8 (01) : 48 - 61
  • [7] Comparison of performance of statistical models in forecasting monthly streamflow of Kizil River, China
    Abudu, Shalamu
    Cui, Chun-liang
    King, James Phillip
    Abudukadeer, Kaiser
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2010, 3 (03) : 269 - 281
  • [8] Application of novel binary optimized machine learning models for monthly streamflow prediction
    Rana Muhammad Adnan
    Hong-Liang Dai
    Reham R. Mostafa
    Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam
    Ozgur Kisi
    Ahmed Elbeltagi
    Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani
    [J]. Applied Water Science, 2023, 13
  • [9] Application of novel binary optimized machine learning models for monthly streamflow prediction
    Adnan, Rana Muhammad
    Dai, Hong-Liang
    Mostafa, Reham R.
    Islam, Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul
    Kisi, Ozgur
    Elbeltagi, Ahmed
    Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad
    [J]. APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [10] Comparison of performance of statistical models in forecasting monthly streamflow of Kizil River,China
    Shalamu ABUDU
    James Phillip KING
    Kaiser ABUDUKADEER
    [J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2010, 3 (03) : 269 - 281