3D printing for heart valve disease: a systematic review

被引:31
|
作者
Tuncay, Volkan [1 ]
van Ooijen, Peter M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Hanzepl 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Heart valves; Printing (three-dimensional); Stereolithography; Tomography (x-ray computed); Ultrasonography; MITRAL-VALVE; AORTIC-VALVE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DATA; IMPLANTATION; MODEL; REPLACEMENT; INTERVENTIONS; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1186/s41747-018-0083-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Current developments showed a fast-increasing implementation and use of three-dimensional (3D) printing in medical applications. Our aim was to review the literature regarding the application of 3D printing to cardiac valve disease. Methods A PubMed search for publications in English with the terms "3D printing" AND "cardiac valve", performed in January 2018, resulted in 64 items. After the analysis of the abstract and text, 27 remained related to the topic. From the references of these 27 papers, 7 papers were added resulting in a total of 34 papers. Of these, 5 were review papers, thus reducing the papers taken into consideration to 29. Results The 29 papers showed that about a decade ago, the interest in 3D printing for this application area was emerging, but only in the past 2 to 3 years it really gained interest. Computed tomography is the most common imaging modality taken into consideration (62%), followed by ultrasound (28%), computer-generated models (computer-aided design) (7%), and magnetic resonance imaging (3%). Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (4/14, 29%) and TangoPlus FullCure 930 (5/14, 36%) are the most used printing materials. Stereolithography (40%) and fused deposition modeling (30%) are the preferred printing techniques, while PolyJet (25%) and laser sintering (4%) are used in a minority of cases. The reported time ranges from 30 min to 3 days. The most reported application area is preoperative planning (63%), followed by training (19%), device testing (11%), and retrospective procedure evaluation (7%). Conclusions In most cases, CT datasets are used and models are printed for preoperative planning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D printing for heart valve disease: a systematic review
    Volkan Tuncay
    Peter M. A. van Ooijen
    [J]. European Radiology Experimental, 3
  • [2] 3D Printing of Aortic Valve Scaffolds for Heart Valve Regeneration
    Georgi, M.
    Ataide-Da Costa, M.
    Saberi, S. E. M.
    Wu, L.
    Ma, H.
    Darbyshire, A.
    Sciscione, F.
    Hamilton, G.
    Song, W. H.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [3] The application of 3D printing in preoperative planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review
    Paris Xenofontos
    Reza Zamani
    Mohammad Akrami
    [J]. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 21
  • [4] The application of 3D printing in preoperative planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review
    Xenofontos, Paris
    Zamani, Reza
    Akrami, Mohammad
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [5] 3D printing in palliative medicine: systematic review
    Kermavnar, Tjasa
    Guttridge, Callum
    Mulcahy, Niall J.
    Duffy, Ed
    Twomey, Feargal
    O'Sullivan, Leonard
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022,
  • [6] 3D Printing in Liver Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Witowski, Jan Sylwester
    Coles-Black, Jasamine
    Zuzak, Tomasz Zbigniew
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    Chuen, Jason
    Major, Piotr
    Budzynski, Andrzej
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2017, 23 (12) : 943 - 947
  • [8] 3D Printing in Radiation Oncology: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Rooney, M. K.
    Rosenberg, D. M.
    Braunstein, S. E.
    Cunha, J. A. M.
    Damato, A. L.
    Ehler, E.
    Pawlicki, T.
    Robar, J. L.
    Golden, D. W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E687 - E687
  • [9] 3D printing in brachytherapy: A systematic review of gynecological applications
    Fahimian, Benjamin P.
    Liu, Wu
    Skinner, Lawrie
    Yu, Amy S.
    Phillips, Tiffany
    Steers, Jennifer M.
    DeMarco, John
    Fraass, Benedick A.
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2023, 22 (04) : 446 - 460
  • [10] Evaluation of 3D printing costs in surgery: a systematic review
    Serrano, Carole
    Fontenay, Sarah
    van den Brink, Helene
    Pineau, Judith
    Prognon, Patrice
    Martelli, Nicolas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 36 (04) : 349 - 355