Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in Advanced Cervical Cancer and Biomarker Study

被引:12
|
作者
Shieh, Kevin R. [1 ]
Huang, Anna [2 ]
Xu, Yiqing [3 ]
机构
[1] Maimonides Hosp, Dept Med, Brooklyn, NY 11219 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Sociomed Sci, Comparat Effectiveness Outcomes Res, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY USA
[3] Maimonides Hosp, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Brooklyn, NY 11219 USA
关键词
cervical cancer; immunotherapy; checkpoint inhibitor; PD-L1; tumor mutation burden; biomarker; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; PEMBROLIZUMAB; RADIATION; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2021.669587
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy or immuno-oncology (IO) treatment in refractory cervical cancer yielded an objective response rate (ORR) of 12% in tumors expressing the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in the KEYNOTE-158 phase II study. We hypothesized that the positive response might be associated with the level of PD-L1 expression and/or the tumor mutation burden (TMB). We also aimed to analyze if responses could be associated with platinum sensitivity. Methods: This is a retrospective study of all consecutive patients with cervical cancer who received pembrolizumab or nivolumab. Results: Ten patients were identified. Median age was 64.5 years old (range 48-80). The response rate was 70% and the median duration of response was 21.0 months (range 1.8-26.7) after 20.7 months of follow-up (range 2.0-31.0). The response rate was 80% in patients with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) >= 10, and 75% in patients with tumor mutation burden (TMB) >= 10 mut/Mb. The mean progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 20.2 months (95% CI 12.0-28.5). Seven patients had treatment for >12 months (range 14.6-31.0). Five patients were platinum-sensitive and 5 patients were platinum-resistant at the time of immunotherapy, and the response rate was similar regardless of platinum sensitivity. Conclusions: The positive response to IO treatment in advanced cervical cancer in this study was higher than published, and a possible association with the level of PD-L1 expression and the TMB level was suggested. A PD-L1 CPS score >= 10 or TMB >= 10 may be biomarkers to correlate with response, which should be explored in large studies.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response and re-treatment response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in advanced cervical cancer: A follow up study
    Wolf, Jennifer
    Xu, Yiqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)
  • [2] Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced cervical cancer: Deepened response with prolonged treatment and repeat response to re-initiation of therapy
    Wolf, Jennifer
    Xu, Yiquing
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 48
  • [3] DNA checkpoint gene mutation as a biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitor in advanced biliary tract cancer
    Shin, Ji Eun
    Kim, Seung Tae
    Choi, Dae-Ho
    Lee, Junho
    Hyeon, Jiyeon
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (06)
  • [4] DNA Checkpoint Gene Mutation as a Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
    Shin, Ji Eun
    Kim, Seung Tae
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 44 (05) : 2103 - 2108
  • [5] An Algorithm as a Biomarker for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy
    Rimm, David L.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2023, 9 (01) : 60 - 61
  • [6] Combined biomarker for prediction of response to an immune checkpoint inhibitor in metastatic gastric cancer
    Heo, You Jeong
    Kang, So Young
    Kim, Seung Tae
    Kang, Won Ki
    Lee, Jeeyun
    Kim, Kyoung-Mee
    [J]. PRECISION AND FUTURE MEDICINE, 2019, 3 (04): : 165 - +
  • [7] Validation of the Combined Biomarker for Prediction of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor in Patients with Advanced Cancer
    Kim, Jin-Chul
    Heo, You-Jeong
    Kang, So-Young
    Lee, Jeeyun
    Kim, Kyoung-Mee
    [J]. CANCERS, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [8] Microsatellite Instability as an Emerging Biomarker for Checkpoint Inhibitor Response in Advanced Prostate Cancer
    Reichert, Zachery R.
    Urrutia, Joshua
    Alumkal, Joshi J.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (04) : 478 - 479
  • [9] Thyroid Toxicity Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in Advanced Cancer
    Muir, Christopher A.
    Menzies, Alexander M.
    Clifton-Bligh, Roderick
    Tsang, Venessa H. M.
    [J]. THYROID, 2020, 30 (10) : 1458 - 1469
  • [10] Serum cell division cycle 42 reflects the treatment response and survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer who receive immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment
    Guo, Lili
    Su, Yue
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Xie, Wan
    Meng, Silu
    Liu, Yuhuan
    Wang, Weijiao
    Lv, Xiaofeng
    Wang, Changyu
    [J]. ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 26 (03)