Playing, Sitting Out, and Observing the Game: An Investigation of Faculty Members' Perspectives on Political Behavior in Ethical Decision Making

被引：1

作者：

Medeiros, Kelsey E. ^{[1
]}

Gibson, Carter ^{[1
]}

Mecca, Jensen T. ^{[1
]}

Giorgini, Vincent ^{[1
]}

Connelly, Shane ^{[1
]}

Mumford, Michael D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73072 USA

来源：

ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE | 2015年 / 22卷 / 05期

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

responsible conduct in research; decision making; organizational relationships; ORGANIZATIONAL POLITICS; INFLUENCE TACTICS; PERCEPTIONS; WORK; CONSEQUENCES; VALIDATION; ATTITUDES; INTUITION; STRESS; MODEL;

D O I：

10.1080/08989621.2014.989219

中图分类号：

R-052 [医学伦理学];

学科分类号：

0101 ; 120402 ;

摘要：

Ethical dilemmas are inherently ambiguous, complex, and ill-defined. Additionally, these dilemmas involve multiple stakeholders. These characteristics may induce political behavior as a resolution tactic. Thus, the goal of the present effort was to investigate perspectives on politics among researchers in an ethical decision-making context. A qualitative analysis of interviews with university faculty members revealed that faculty members' perspectives on political behavior in an ethical decision-making context fall into a number of categories, including positive, negative, and realistic views of political activity. The implications of these varying perspectives on ethical decision making are discussed.

引用

页码：284 / 300

页数：17