Double Dissociation of Amygdala and Hippocampal Contributions to Trace and Delay Fear Conditioning

被引:84
|
作者
Raybuck, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Lattal, K. Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Behav Neurosci, Portland, OR 97201 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2011年 / 6卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; BASOLATERAL AMYGDALA; REVERSIBLE INACTIVATION; DORSAL HIPPOCAMPUS; ENTORHINAL CORTEX; PERIRHINAL CORTEX; C57BL/6; MICE; EXPRESSION; MEMORY; RAT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0015982
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A key finding in studies of the neurobiology of learning memory is that the amygdala is critically involved in Pavlovian fear conditioning. This is well established in delay-cued and contextual fear conditioning; however, surprisingly little is known of the role of the amygdala in trace conditioning. Trace fear conditioning, in which the CS and US are separated in time by a trace interval, requires the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. It is possible that recruitment of cortical structures by trace conditioning alters the role of the amygdala compared to delay fear conditioning, where the CS and US overlap. To investigate this, we inactivated the amygdala of male C57BL/6 mice with GABA (A) agonist muscimol prior to 2-pairing trace or delay fear conditioning. Amygdala inactivation produced deficits in contextual and delay conditioning, but had no effect on trace conditioning. As controls, we demonstrate that dorsal hippocampal inactivation produced deficits in trace and contextual, but not delay fear conditioning. Further, pre- and post-training amygdala inactivation disrupted the contextual but the not cued component of trace conditioning, as did muscimol infusion prior to 1- or 4-pairing trace conditioning. These findings demonstrate that insertion of a temporal gap between the CS and US can generate amygdala-independent fear conditioning. We discuss the implications of this surprising finding for current models of the neural circuitry involved in fear conditioning.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The amygdala is critical for trace, delay, and contextual fear conditioning
    Kochli, Daniel E.
    Thompson, Elaine C.
    Fricke, Elizabeth A.
    Postle, Abagail F.
    Quinn, Jennifer J.
    [J]. LEARNING & MEMORY, 2015, 22 (02) : 92 - 100
  • [2] Contextual fear conditioning in humans: Cortical-hippocampal and amygdala contributions
    Alvarez, Ruben P.
    Biggs, Arter
    Chen, Gang
    Pine, Daniel S.
    Grillon, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (24): : 6211 - 6219
  • [3] Pharmacological dissociation of trace and long-delay fear conditioning in young rats
    Hunt, Pamela S.
    Richardson, Rick
    [J]. NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY, 2007, 87 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [4] Awareness in trace and delay fear conditioning
    Schaer, Thomas C.
    Weike, Almut I.
    Hamm, Alfons O.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 43 : S87 - S87
  • [5] Muscarinic Receptors in Amygdala Control Trace Fear Conditioning
    Baysinger, Amber N.
    Kent, Brianne A.
    Brown, Thomas H.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (09):
  • [6] CONTEXT AND CS FEAR IN DELAY AND TRACE CONDITIONING
    MARLIN, NA
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1983, 21 (05) : 350 - 350
  • [7] The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans
    Knight, David C.
    Nguyen, Hanh T.
    Bandettini, Peter A.
    [J]. COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 6 (02) : 157 - 162
  • [8] The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans
    Dava C. Knight
    Hanh T. Nguyen
    Peter A. Bandettini
    [J]. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2006, 6 : 157 - 162
  • [9] Fear acquisition requires awareness in trace but not delay conditioning
    Weike, Almut I.
    Schupp, Harald T.
    Hamm, Alfons O.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 (01) : 170 - 180
  • [10] Subregion-specific differences in hippocampal activity between Delay and Trace fear conditioning: an immunohistochemical analysis
    Weitemier, AZ
    Ryabinin, AE
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 995 (01) : 55 - 65