Digital interventions to facilitate patient-provider communication in cancer care: A systematic review

被引:34
|
作者
Hong, Y. Alicia [1 ]
Hossain, Md Mahbub [2 ]
Chou, Wen-Ying Sylvia [3 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Dept Hlth Adm & Policy, Coll Hlth & Human Serv, 4400 Univ Dr,MS 1j3, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Hlth Promot & Community Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, College Stn, TX USA
[3] NCI, Hlth Commun & Informat Res Branch, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
cancer patients; cancer survivors; digital intervention; patient-provider communication; review; LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-CARE; MANAGEMENT SUPPORT; SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT; SELF-MANAGEMENT; INTERNET; INFORMATION; SURVIVORS;
D O I
10.1002/pon.5310
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Patient-provider communication is a critical component of cancer care. Digital tools have been applied to facilitate cancer care and patient-provider communication. However, to date, there is no systematic review on this growing body of literature. The objective of this study is to identify the existing digital interventions to improve patient-provider communication among cancer patients and survivors, summarize their characteristics, and synthesize the outcomes of these interventions. Methods We searched the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines with the following criteria: (a) empirical studies focusing on digital interventions to facilitate communication between cancer patients or survivors and their health care providers, (b) reporting qualitative or quantitative health outcomes of the cancer patients or survivors after the digital intervention, and (c) English articles published after 2000. Results The initial literature search generated 1006 articles; only 13 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were conducted among breast, prostate, and lung cancer patients. Ten out of 13 studies used randomized controlled trials to evaluate intervention efficacy. The outcomes assessed included symptoms reporting and management, decision making, distress and quality of life, and utilization of health care. Most studies reported positive outcomes following the interventions. Conclusions The existing evidence on the number, characteristics, and outcomes of digital interventions to improve patient-provider communication suggests the preliminary efficacy of such interventions. It is essential to develop and implement more evidence-based digital interventions to engage patients, enhance patient-provider communication, and facilitate patient-centered decision making to improve patient-centered health outcomes, especially in underserved communities of cancer patients and survivors.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 603
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-Provider Satisfaction and Communication in US Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review
    Leyser-Whalen, Ophra
    Ambert, Paulina A.
    Wilson, Alexis L.
    Quaney, Vianey
    Estrella, Francisco
    Gomez, Margaret
    Monteblanco, Adelle D.
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2024, : 1485 - 1494
  • [2] Patient-provider communication about sexual concerns in cancer: a systematic review
    Reese, Jennifer Barsky
    Sorice, Kristen
    Beach, Mary Catherine
    Porter, Laura S.
    Tulsky, James A.
    Daly, Mary B.
    Lepore, Stephen J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2017, 11 (02) : 175 - 188
  • [3] Patient-provider communication about sexual concerns in cancer: a systematic review
    Jennifer Barsky Reese
    Kristen Sorice
    Mary Catherine Beach
    Laura S. Porter
    James A. Tulsky
    Mary B. Daly
    Stephen J. Lepore
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2017, 11 : 175 - 188
  • [4] INTERSECTIONALITY AND THE QUALITY OF PATIENT-PROVIDER COMMUNICATION IN CANCER CARE
    Torres-Estrada, Alma M.
    Irvin, Veronica L.
    Khanna, Sunil K.
    Harvey, Marie
    Mojica, Cynthia M.
    Lopez-Cevallos, Daniel Fernando
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2020, 54 : S549 - S549
  • [5] E-mail in patient-provider communication: A systematic review
    Ye, Jiali
    Rust, George
    Fry-Johnson, Yvonne
    Strothers, Harry
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 80 (02) : 266 - 273
  • [6] Impact of Locus of Control on Patient-Provider Communication: A Systematic Review
    Rodriguez, Alva
    Patton, Caroline Delbourgo
    Stephenson-Hunter, Cara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2023, 28 (03) : 190 - 204
  • [7] STIGMA, PATIENT ACTIVATION, AND PATIENT-PROVIDER COMMUNICATION IN LUNG CANCER CARE
    Hamann, Heidi A.
    Borderud, Sarah P.
    Higashi, Robin
    Peterson, Lisa
    Funk, Rachel
    Lee, Simon J. Craddock.
    Cisneros, Cassidy A.
    Shen, Megan Johnson.
    Ostroff, Jamie
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2015, 49 : S225 - S225
  • [8] Patient-provider communication in cancer screening
    Nguyen, TT
    McPhee, SJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 (05) : 402 - 403
  • [9] Patient-provider communication in cancer screening
    Tung T. Nguyen
    Stephen J. Mcphee
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2003, 18 : 402 - 403
  • [10] Patients' perceptions of patient-provider communication and diabetes care: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies
    Peimani, Maryam
    Nasli-Esfahani, Ensieh
    Sadeghi, Roya
    [J]. CHRONIC ILLNESS, 2020, 16 (01) : 3 - 22