Participatory science for coastal water quality: freshwater plume mapping and volunteer retention in a randomized informational intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Jennings, Wiley C. [1 ]
Cunniff, Sydney [1 ]
Lewis, Kate [1 ]
Deres, Hailey [1 ]
Reineman, Dan R. [1 ,3 ]
Davis, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Boehm, Alexandria B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 473 Via Ortega,Room 189, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Calif State Univ Channel Isl, Environm Sci & Resource Management Program, Camarillo, CA 93012 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CITIZEN SCIENCE; INDICATOR BACTERIA; MOTIVATIONS; CONTAMINATION; IMPROVE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1039/c9em00571d
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Among the biggest threats to coastal water quality are freshwater discharges. It is difficult to predict the spatial extent of freshwater plumes at marine beaches because processes governing mass transport in the surf zone are complex. Participatory science approaches could facilitate collecting shoreline data, although volunteer sampling campaigns can be challenged by data quality and volunteer retention. The goals of this study were to (1) work with volunteers to estimate safe swimming distances at beaches that receive polluted discharges, and (2) test whether informational feedback to volunteers increased retention. Forty-six volunteers participated over 12 weeks in 2019 by collecting 1452 salinity measurements at beaches near the mouths of two Central California freshwater discharges and completing participation surveys. These measurements resulted in 145 distinct estimates of safe swimming distances (D-90), spanning a range of environmental conditions during rainy and dry periods. MedianD(90)s were 150 and 100 m at San Pedro Creek south and north, and 490 and 330 m at San Lorenzo River west and east, respectively.D(90)was significantly associated with adjacent freshwater discharge rate at both discharges and tide level at one discharge. On average, the odds of volunteers conducting sampling decreased by 4% (95% CI: 1%, 7%) with each successive week. A randomized intervention providing repeated data feedbackviaemail to volunteers did not affect their retention in the study.
引用
收藏
页码:918 / 929
页数:12
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据