The tensile strength of volcanic rocks: Experiments and models

被引:18
|
作者
Heap, Michael J. [1 ,2 ]
Wadsworth, Fabian B. [3 ]
Heng, Zhen [4 ]
Xu, Tao [4 ]
Griffiths, Luke [5 ]
Velasco, Andrea Aguilar [1 ]
Vaire, Emma [1 ]
Vistour, Marie [1 ]
Reuschle, Thierry [1 ]
Troll, Valentin R. [6 ]
Deegan, Frances M. [6 ]
Tang, Chun'an [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strasbourg, CNRS, Inst Terre & Environm Strasbourg, UMR 7063, 5 Rue Rene Descartes, F-67084 Strasbourg, France
[2] Inst Univ France IUF, 1 Rue Descartes, F-75231 Paris, France
[3] Univ Durham, Sci Labs, Earth Sci, Durham DL1 3LE, England
[4] Northeastern Univ, Ctr Rock Instabil & Seism Res, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
[5] NGI Norwegian Geotech Inst, N-0806 Oslo, Norway
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci Nat Resources & Sustainable Dev NR, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] Dalian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Coastal & Offshore Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[8] China Univ Geosci Wuhan, State Key Lab Geol Proc & Mineral Resources, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Tensile strength; Volcanic rock; Porosity; Pore geometry; Constitutive models; EDIFICE-FORMING ANDESITES; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; UNIAXIAL COMPRESSION; ITALY IMPLICATIONS; PORE GEOMETRY; CAMPI FLEGREI; MAGMA; FRAGMENTATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107348
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The tensile strength of volcanic rock exerts control over several key volcanic processes, including fragmentation and magma chamber rupture. Despite its importance, there is a paucity of laboratory data for the tensile strength of volcanic rocks, leading to an incomplete understanding of the influence of microstructural parameters, such as pore size and shape (factors that vary widely for volcanic rocks), on their tensile strength. To circumvent problems associated with the variability of natural samples, we provide here a systematic study in which we use elastic damage mechanics code "Rock Failure Process Analysis" to perform numerical experiments to better understand the influence of porosity, pore diameter, pore aspect ratio, and pore orientation on the tensile strength of volcanic rocks. We find that porosity and pore diameter exert a first-order control on the tensile strength of volcanic rocks, and that pore aspect ratio and orientation also influence tensile strength. Tensile strength is reduced by up to a factor of two as porosity is increased from 0.05 to 0.35 or as pore diameter is increased from 1 to 2 mm. Small, but systematic, reductions in tensile strength are observed as the angle between the loading direction and the major axis of an elliptical pore is increased from 0 to 90 degrees. The influence of pore aspect ratio (the ratio of the minor to major axis of an ellipse) depends on the pore angle: when the pore angle is 0 degrees, a decrease in pore aspect ratio, from 1 (a circle) to 0.2, increases the tensile strength, whereas the same decrease in pore aspect ratio does not substantially change the tensile strength when the pore angle is 90 degrees. These latter numerical experiments show that the tensile strength of volcanic rocks can be anisotropic. Our numerical data are in broad agreement with new and compiled experimental data for the tensile strength of volcanic rocks. One of the goals of this contribution is to provide better constrained constitutive models for the tensile strength of volcanic rocks for use in volcano modelling. To this end, we present a series of theoretical and semi-empirical constitutive models that can be used to determine the tensile strength of volcanic rocks, and highlight how tensile strength estimations can influence predictions of magma overpressures and assessments of the volume and radius of a magma chamber. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The tensile strength of hydrothermally altered volcanic rocks
    Heap, Michael J.
    Harnett, Claire E.
    Wadsworth, Fabian B.
    Gilg, H. Albert
    Carbillet, Lucille
    Rosas-Carbajal, Marina
    Komorowski, Jean-Christophe
    Baud, Patrick
    Troll, Valentin R.
    Deegan, Frances M.
    Holohan, Eoghan P.
    Moretti, Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2022, 428
  • [2] Experiments to Determine Static and Dynamic Tensile Strength of Deccan Trap Rocks, India
    Malik, Akx
    Chakraborty, Tanusree
    Rao, K. S.
    Kumar, D.
    [J]. ISRM EUROPEAN ROCK MECHANICS SYMPOSIUM EUROCK 2017, 2017, 191 : 946 - 953
  • [3] MEASURING THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF ROCKS
    WUERKER, RG
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGICAL ENGINEERS, 1955, 202 (02): : 157 - 157
  • [4] Influence of heating on the dynamic tensile strength of two mortars: Experiments and models
    Yao, Wei
    Xia, Kaiwen
    Liu, Hung-Wei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2018, 122 : 407 - 418
  • [5] On the Measurement of the Tensile Strength of Soft Rocks
    A. Coviello
    R. Lagioia
    R. Nova
    [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2005, 38 : 251 - 273
  • [6] DYNAMIC TENSILE FRACTURE STRENGTH OF ROCKS
    KHAN, AS
    IRANI, FK
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 1982, 22 (05) : N43 - N43
  • [7] EFFECTIVE TENSILE-STRENGTH OF ROCKS
    SECOR, DT
    MONTENVO.V
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1972, 53 (11): : 1125 - &
  • [8] On the measurement of the tensile strength of soft rocks
    Coviello, A
    Lagioia, R
    Nova, R
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2005, 38 (04) : 251 - 273
  • [9] Shock tube experiments on molten volcanic rocks
    Spieler, O
    Dingwell, DB
    [J]. LITHOS, 2004, 73 (1-2) : S106 - S106
  • [10] An alternative approach to obtaining the direct tensile strength of the rocks from the indirect tensile strength
    Tufekci, Kenan
    Demirdag, Servet
    Sengun, Nazmi
    Efe, Tamer
    Altindag, Rasit
    [J]. PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2021, 27 (06): : 756 - 765