The Concept of Risk and Possibilities of Application of Mathematical Methods in Supporting Decision Making for Sustainable Energy Development

被引:19
|
作者
Rabe, Marcin [1 ]
Streimikiene, Dalia [2 ]
Bilan, Yuriy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Szczecin, Fac Management & Econ Serv, PL-71004 Szczecin, Poland
[2] Lithuanian Inst Agrarian Econ, V Kudirkos Str 18-2, LT-03105 Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Rzeszow Univ Technol, Fac Management, Powstancow Warszawy 12, PL-35959 Rzeszow, Poland
关键词
risk; decision making; sustainable energy; energy sector development; lexicographical method; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGIES; UNCERTAINTY; PORTFOLIO; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su11041018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study is devoted to presentation of the concept of risk, and the possibility of applying mathematical methods in supporting decision making in the energy sector to promote sustainable energy development. The problem with risk assessment in the energy sector arises mainly due to the difficulty of expressing risk in numerical terms. To avoid risk, it is necessary to set the criteria and objectives of measurement before making decisions in the energy sector. The aim of this study is to try to fill in this gap by means of comparing decisions under risk conditions within models supporting energy decisions. The authors' focus is on the problem of risk in supporting decision making towards sustainable energy sector development, which is the main target of the European Union (EU) energy policies. Without the ability to determine the probability of occurrence of certain phenomena and their inclusion into the model, it is not possible to determine how well the solutions resulting from the models are accurate, and what is the probability of their implementation under specific conditions linked to renewable energy development.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A mashup supporting sustainable decision making
    Knoch, Soenke
    Kroener, Alexander
    [J]. NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ENVIRONMENTS (IE 2013), 2013, : 274 - 277
  • [2] A multicriteria decision making methodology for sustainable energy development
    Papadaki, M
    Tsoutsos, T
    Maria, E
    Antonidakis, E
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2003, 12 (05): : 426 - 430
  • [3] Biogas as a sustainable energy source in China: Regional development strategy application and decision making
    Deng, Yanfei
    Xu, Jiuping
    Liu, Ying
    Mancl, Karen
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 35 : 294 - 303
  • [4] POSSIBILITIES OF USING HERBACEOUS BIOMASS FOR ENERGY PURPOSES IN THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
    Kraszkiewicz, Artur
    Dula, Malgorzata
    [J]. FARM MACHINERY AND PROCESSES MANAGEMENT IN SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE (FMPMSA 2019), 2019, : 197 - 202
  • [5] Method Families Concept: Application to Decision-Making Methods
    Kornyshova, Elena
    Deneckere, Rebecca
    Rolland, Colette
    [J]. ENTERPRISE, BUSINESS-PROCESS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODELING, 2011, 81 : 413 - 427
  • [6] Supporting decision-making for sustainable nanotechnology
    Malsch I.
    Subramanian V.
    Semenzin E.
    Hristozov D.
    Marcomini A.
    [J]. Environment Systems and Decisions, 2015, 35 (1) : 54 - 75
  • [7] The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications
    Dos Santos, Paulo Henrique
    Neves, Sandra Miranda
    Sant'Anna, Daniele Ornaghi
    de Oliveira, Carlos Henrique
    Carvalho, Henrique Duarte
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 : 119 - 138
  • [8] Decision making for sustainable development
    Hegarty, John
    Maubrey, Regis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2020, 29 (497-510) : 497 - 510
  • [9] An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Dealing with Sustainable Energy Development Issues
    Siksnelyte, Indre
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Sharma, Deepak
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (10)
  • [10] Supporting the decision-making process for sustainable housing
    Li, Helen
    Shen, Qiping
    [J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2002, 20 (05) : 387 - 390