Null-Hypothesis LLR: A proposal for Forensic Automatic Speaker Recognition

被引:4
|
作者
Solewicz, Yosef A. [1 ]
Jessen, Michael [2 ]
van der Vloed, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Police, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Bundeskriminalamt, Wiesbaden, Germany
[3] Netherlands Forens Inst, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
automatic speaker recognition; forensic speech science; likelihood ratios; calibration;
D O I
10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1023
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A new method named Null-Hypothesis LLR (H0LLR) is proposed for forensic automatic speaker recognition. The method takes into account the fact that forensically realistic data are difficult to collect and that inter-individual variation is generally better represented than intra-individual variation. According to the proposal, intra-individual variation is modeled as a projection from case-customized inter-individual variation. Calibrated log Likelihood Ratios (LLR) that are calculated on the basis of the H0LLR method were tested on two corpora of forensically-founded telephone interception test sets, German-based GFS 2.0 and Dutch-based NFI-FRITS. Five automatic speaker recognition systems were tested based on the scores or the LLRs provided by these systems which form the input to H0LLR. Speaker discrimination and calibration performance of H0LLR is comparable to the performance indices of the system-internal LLR calculation methods. This shows that external data and strategies that work with data outside the forensic domain and without case customization are not necessary. It is also shown that H0LLR leads to a reduction in the diversity of LLR output patterns of different automatic systems. This is important for the credibility of the Likelihood Ratio framework in forensics, and its application in forensic automatic speaker recognition in particular.
引用
收藏
页码:2849 / 2853
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Forensic automatic speaker recognition
    Drygajlo, Andrzej
    [J]. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2007, 24 (02) : 132 - 135
  • [2] THE FALLACY OF THE NULL-HYPOTHESIS SIGNIFICANCE TEST
    ROZEBOOM, WW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1960, 57 (05) : 416 - 428
  • [3] An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests
    Killeen, PR
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (05) : 345 - 353
  • [4] Automatic Speaker Recognition for Mobile Forensic Applications
    Algabri, Mohammed
    Mathkour, Hassan
    Bencherif, Mohamed A.
    Alsulaiman, Mansour
    Mekhtiche, Mohamed A.
    [J]. MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 2017
  • [5] A viable alternative to null-hypothesis testing
    Zumbo, BD
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1998, 21 (02) : 227 - +
  • [6] FM Features for Automatic Forensic Speaker Recognition
    Thiruvaran, Tharmarajah
    Ambikairajah, Eliathamby
    Epps, Julien
    [J]. INTERSPEECH 2008: 9TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2008, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 1497 - 1500
  • [7] Forensic Automatic Speaker Recognition: Fiction or Science?
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Joaquin
    [J]. INTERSPEECH 2008: 9TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2008, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 16 - 17
  • [8] Complementing the P-value from null-hypothesis significance testing with a Bayes factor from null-hypothesis Bayesian testing
    Malone, Helen Evelyn
    Coyne, Imelda
    [J]. NURSE RESEARCHER, 2020, 28 (04) : 41 - 48
  • [9] Forensic Automatic Speaker Recognition with Degraded and Enhanced Speech
    Kuenzel, Hermann
    Alexander, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AUDIO ENGINEERING SOCIETY, 2014, 62 (04): : 244 - 253
  • [10] Aural and automatic forensic speaker recognition in mismatched conditions
    Alexander, Anil
    Dessimoz, Damien
    Botti, Filippo
    Drygajlo, Andrzel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND THE LAW, 2005, 12 (02) : 214 - 234