Does foreign direct investment influence R&D activity in the host country? Evidence from Vietnam

被引:5
|
作者
Ha, Van [1 ,2 ]
Holmes, Mark J. [1 ]
Hassan, Gazi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waikato, Waikato Management Sch, Econ, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Thuongmai Univ, Econ, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Research and development (R&D); Innovation; Foreign direct investment (FDI); Domestic firms; D22; F21; F23; O12; DEVELOPMENT SPILLOVERS; DOMESTIC FIRMS; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER; FDI; PRODUCTIVITY; INNOVATION; CHINA; INSTITUTIONS; EFFICIENCY; LINKAGES;
D O I
10.1108/IJOEM-08-2020-0932
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This study focuses on the linkages between foreign direct investment and the research and development (R&D) and innovation activity of domestic enterprises in Vietnam. Design/methodology/approach The Heckman selection model approach is applied to a panel dataset of nearly 7,000 Vietnamese firms for the 2011-2015 study period to investigate the impact of foreign presence on the R&D of local firms through horizontal and vertical linkages. Probit model estimation is employed to examine how foreign investment influences the innovation activity of local companies. Findings While there are a small number of firms carrying out R&D activities in Vietnam, foreign or joint domestic-foreign venture firms are less inclined than domestic firms to undertake R&D. Domestic factors that include capital, labor quality, location and export status of firm have a significant effect on the decision of domestic firms to participate in R&D activity. Only forward linkages and the gross firm output are found to have an impact on the R&D intensity of domestic enterprises, while other factors appear to have no significant influence on how much firms spend on R&D activities. Practical implications In order to promote the R&D activity of domestic firms, policy should focus on (1) the backward linkages between local firms in downstream sectors with their foreign suppliers in upstream sectors, and (2) the internal factors such as labor, capital or location that affect the decisions made by domestic firms. Originality/value Given that foreign investment may affect R&D and innovation activity of local firms in host countries, the impact is relatively unexplored for many emerging economies and not so in the case of Vietnam. The availability of a unique survey on Vietnamese firm technology and competitiveness provides the opportunity to address this gap in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:2599 / 2619
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Foreign Direct Investment, Technology Spillovers, and Host Country Spending on R&D
    Elmawazini, Khaled
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ADVANCES IN ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (03) : 325 - 325
  • [2] R&D Subsidies and Foreign Direct Investment
    Gomez, Manuel A.
    Sequeira, Tiago Neves
    [J]. OPEN ECONOMIES REVIEW, 2016, 27 (04) : 769 - 793
  • [3] Foreign direct investment in R&D in India
    Mrinalini, N.
    Nath, Pradosh
    Sandhya, G. D.
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2013, 105 (06): : 767 - 773
  • [4] R&D Subsidies and Foreign Direct Investment
    Manuel A. Gómez
    Tiago Neves Sequeira
    [J]. Open Economies Review, 2016, 27 : 769 - 793
  • [5] Foreign direct investment and the nature of R&D
    Glass, AJ
    Saggi, K
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 1999, 32 (01): : 92 - 117
  • [6] Foreign direct investment and domestic investment in the host country: evidence from panel study
    Wang, Miao
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2010, 42 (29) : 3711 - 3721
  • [7] Domestic R&D, Foreign Direct Investment and Welfare
    Yang, Yibai
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2015, 19 (04) : 908 - 924
  • [8] Trade, foreign direct investment, and R&D spillovers
    Hejazi, W
    Safarian, AE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 1999, 30 (03) : 491 - 511
  • [9] Foreign direct investment and R&D spillovers - Is there a connection?
    Branstetter, L
    [J]. ROLE OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN EAST ASIAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 9 : 113 - 146
  • [10] R&D, foreign direct investment and technology sourcing?
    Co, CY
    [J]. REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2000, 16 (04) : 385 - 397