TESTING TWIN DEFICITS HYPOTHESIS FOR EU-27 AND TURKEY: A PANEL GRANGER CAUSALITY APPROACH UNDER CROSS-SECTIONAL DEPENDENCE

被引:0
|
作者
Bolukbas, Mehmet [1 ]
Topal, Mehmet Hanefi [2 ]
Hotunluoglu, Hakan [3 ]
机构
[1] Adnan Menderes Univ, Dept Econ, Aydin, Turkey
[2] Gumushane Univ, Dept Publ Finance, Gumushane, Turkey
[3] Adnan Menderes Univ, Dept Publ Finance, Aydin, Turkey
来源
关键词
budget deficit; current account deficit; twin deficits hypothesis; cross-sectional dependence; panel Granger causality; CURRENT ACCOUNT; FISCAL-POLICY; BUDGET;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Twin deficits hypothesis has been one of the most widely-applied phenomenon in the economics literature. In this study, the twin deficits hypothesis was tested for the EU-27 member states and Turkey with the data covering the 2002: Q1-2014: Q1 period. Unlike other studies, the twin deficits hypothesis was tested by using second generation panel causality tests that considered the cross-sectional dependence. According to the findings of this study, which used panel Granger causality tests suggested by Dumitrescu-Hurlin (2012) and Emirmahmutoglu-Kose (2011), there is statistically significant bidirectional causality between budget deficit (BD) and current account deficit (CAD) in the relevant period. It was found out a bidirectional causality between BD and CAD in sixteen of the twenty-eight countries (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Romania, Spain, Turkey and the UK) and a unidirectional causality from BD to CAD was also noticed in five EU countries (Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia). Nevertheless, the findings indicated that there is a unidirectional causality from CAD to BD in Hungary, Luxembourg and Malta but there is no causality between BD and CAD in Ireland, Portugal, Slovenia, and Sweden.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 119
页数:19
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Testing for Granger causality in heterogeneous panels with cross-sectional dependence
    Nazlioglu, Saban
    Karul, Cagin
    [J]. EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 67 (04) : 1541 - 1579
  • [2] Testing Granger Non-Causality in Panels with Cross-Sectional Dependencies
    Minorics, Lenon
    Turkmen, Caner
    Kernert, David
    Bloebaum, Patrick
    Callot, Laurent
    Janzing, Dominik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 151, 2022, 151
  • [3] Testing for Panel Unit Roots under General Cross-sectional Dependence
    Holgersson, H. E. T.
    Mansson, K.
    Shukur, G.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2016, 45 (05) : 1785 - 1801
  • [4] Testing for Cross-sectional Dependence in Regional Panel Data
    Jensen, Peter Sandholt
    Schmidt, Torben Dall
    [J]. SPATIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, 2011, 6 (04) : 423 - 450
  • [5] Dynamic Panel Analysis under Cross-Sectional Dependence
    Gaibulloev, Khusrav
    Sandler, Todd
    Sul, Donggyu
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 22 (02) : 258 - 273
  • [6] Panel vector autoregression under cross-sectional dependence
    Huang, Xlao
    [J]. ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL, 2008, 11 (02): : 219 - 243
  • [7] Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models
    De Hoyos, Rafael E.
    Sarafidis, Vasilis
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2006, 6 (04): : 482 - 496
  • [8] Testing for nonlinear panel unit roots under cross-sectional dependency - With an application to the PPP hypothesis
    Mansson, Kristofer
    Sjolander, Par
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2014, 38 : 121 - 132
  • [9] An instrumental variable approach for panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence
    Shin, Dong Wan
    Kang, Seungho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2006, 134 (01) : 215 - 234
  • [10] Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence
    Breitung, J
    Das, S
    [J]. STATISTICA NEERLANDICA, 2005, 59 (04) : 414 - 433