Does This Patient Have Medical Decision-Making Capacity?

被引:185
|
作者
Sessums, Laura L. [1 ]
Zembrzuska, Hanna [1 ]
Jackson, Jeffrey L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Gen Internal Med Sect, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[2] Zablocki VA Med Ctr, Div Gen Internal Med, Milwaukee, WI USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
来源
关键词
MACARTHUR TREATMENT COMPETENCE; PHYSICIANS LEGAL STANDARD; MENTALLY-ILL PATIENTS; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; INFORMED-CONSENT; COGNITIVE PREDICTORS; PERSONAL JUDGMENTS; OLDER PERSONS; HOSPITALIZATION; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2011.1023
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Evaluation of the capacity of a patient to make medical decisions should occur in the context of specific medical decisions when incapacity is considered. Objective To determine the prevalence of incapacity and assessment accuracy in adult medicine patients without severe mental illnesses. Data Sources MEDLINE and EMBASE (from their inception through April 2011) and bibliographies of retrieved articles. Study Selection We included high-quality prospective studies (n=43) of instruments that evaluated medical decision-making capacity for treatment decisions. Data Extraction Two authors independently appraised study quality, extracted relevant data, and resolved disagreements by consensus. Data Synthesis Incapacity was uncommon in healthy elderly control participants (2.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7%-3.9%) compared with medicine inpatients (26%; 95% CI, 18%-35%). Clinicians accurately diagnosed incapacity (positive likelihood ratio [LR+] of 7.9; 95% CI, 2.7-13), although they recognized it in only 42% (95% CI, 30%-53%) of affected patients. Although not designed to assess incapacity, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores less than 20 increased the likelihood of incapacity (LR, 6.3; 95% CI, 3.7-11), scores of 20 to 24 had no effect (LR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.53-1.2), and scores greater than 24 significantly lowered the likelihood of incapacity (LR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34). Of 9 instruments compared with a gold standard, only 3 are easily performed and have useful test characteristics: the Aid to Capacity Evaluation (ACE) (LR+, 8.5; 95% CI, 3.9-19; negative LR [LR-], 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11-0.41), the Hopkins Competency Assessment Test (LR+, 54; 95% CI, 3.5-846; LR-, 0; 95% CI, 0.0-0.52), and the Understanding Treatment Disclosure (LR+, 6.0; 95% CI, 2.1-17; LR-, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06-0.41). The ACE was validated in the largest study; it is freely available online and includes a training module. Conclusions Incapacity is common and often not recognized. The MMSE is useful only at extreme scores. The ACE is the best available instrument to assist physicians in making assessments of medical decision-making capacity. JAMA. 2011; 306(4): 420-427
引用
下载
收藏
页码:420 / 427
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Medical Decision-Making Capacity in Depression
    Ostermeyer, Britta
    Flores, Araceli
    Dukes, Charles
    Shah, Asim A.
    PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS, 2016, 46 (04) : 247 - 252
  • [3] PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
    WU, WC
    PEARLMAN, RA
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1986, 34 (02): : A845 - A845
  • [4] PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
    WU, WC
    PEARLMAN, RA
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1986, 34 (01): : A38 - A38
  • [5] PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
    STRULL, W
    CHARLES, G
    LO, B
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 32 (02): : A301 - A301
  • [6] PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
    STRULL, W
    LO, B
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 32 (01): : A32 - A32
  • [7] Evaluating Medical Decision-Making Capacity in Practice
    Barstow, Craig
    Shahan, Brian
    Roberts, Melissa
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2018, 98 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [8] Medical Decision-Making Capacity and Cataract Surgery
    Swanson, Mark W.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2012, 89 (10) : E23 - E26
  • [9] Impaired medical decision-making capacity in TBI
    Hemi Malkki
    Nature Reviews Neurology, 2016, 12 (10) : 555 - 555
  • [10] Decision-making capacity in elderly cancer patient
    Weidmann-Huegle, T.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 39 : 23 - 23