Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents

被引:69
|
作者
Kandzari, David E. [1 ]
Koolen, Jacques J. [2 ]
Doros, Gheorghe [3 ]
Massaro, Joseph J. [4 ]
Garcia-Garcia, Hector M. [5 ]
Bennett, Johan [6 ]
Roguin, Ariel [7 ]
Gharib, Elie G. [8 ]
Cutlip, Donald E. [9 ]
Waksman, Ron [5 ]
机构
[1] Piedmont Heart Inst, Suite 2065,95 Collier Rd, Atlanta, GA 30309 USA
[2] Catharina Hosp, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Baim Inst Clin Res, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Boston, MA USA
[5] MedStar Washington Hosp Ctr, Div Intervent Cardiol, MedStar Cardiovasc Res Network, Washington, DC USA
[6] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Leuven, Belgium
[7] Rambam Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Haifa, Israel
[8] Charleston Area Med Ctr, Charleston, WV USA
[9] Baim Inst Clin Res, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
关键词
bioresorbable polymer; drug-eluting stent; percutaneous coronary intervention; sirolimus; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; BIODEGRADABLE-POLYMER; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; BIOFLOW V; FOLLOW-UP; REVASCULARIZATION; TRIAL; STRUT; NEOATHEROSCLEROSIS; PATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Coronary drug-eluting stent development has introduced new metal alloys, changes in stent architecture, and bioresorbable polymers. Whether these advancements improve long-term clinical safety and efficacy has been inconsistent in prior studies. OBJECTIVES The authors sought to compare late-term clinical outcomes among patients treated with an ultrathin strut (60 mm) bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP SES) and a thin strut (81 mm) durable polymer everolimuseluting stent (DP EES) in a large randomized trial. METHODS BIOFLOW V (Biotronik Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects with Up to Three De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions V) was an international randomized trial comparing coronary revascularization with BP SES and DP EES regarding the primary endpoint of 12-month target lesion failure (TLF). Analysis of pre-specified 2-year clinical outcomes was performed. RESULTS Among 1,334 patients randomized to treatment with BP SES (n = 884) or DP EES (n = 450), the 2-year TLF rate was 7.5% for BP SES and 11.9% for DP EES (-4.33% treatment difference; 95% confidence interval: -8.16% to -0.91%; p = 0.015), driven by differences in target vessel myocardial infarction (MI) (5.3% vs. 9.5%; p = 0.01) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (2.6% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.04). Rates of cardiac death or MI were 7.0% versus 10.4% for BP SES and DP EES, respectively (p = 0.047). Late/very late definite stent thrombosis was statistically lower for BP SES compared with DP EES (0.1% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS In a large randomized trial, significant differences in both TLF and target vessel-related MI persisted through 2 years, favoring treatment with BP SES over DP EES. Significantly lower cumulative target lesion revascularization and late/very late stent thrombosis were also observed with BP SES. (Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions [BIOFLOW-V]; NCT02389946) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72: 3287-97) (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:3287 / 3297
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents
    Kandzari, David E.
    Koolen, Jacques J.
    Doros, Gheorghe
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    Bennett, Johan
    Roguin, Ariel
    Gharib, Elie G.
    Cutlip, Donald E.
    Waksman, Ron
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (18) : 1852 - 1860
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety of the Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
    Waksman, Ron
    Windecker, Stephan
    Koolen, Jacques J.
    Kandzari, David
    Saito, Shigeru
    Kolm, Paul
    Torguson, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (13) : B315 - B315
  • [3] Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions
    Dan, Kazuhiro
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    Kolm, Paul
    Windecker, Stephan
    Saito, Shigeru
    Kandzari, David E.
    Waksman, Ron
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (09) : E009189
  • [4] Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial
    Kandzari, David E.
    Mauri, Laura
    Koolen, Jacques J.
    Massaro, Joseph M.
    Doros, Gheorghe
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    Bennett, Johan
    Roguin, Ariel
    Gharib, Elie G.
    Cutlip, Donald E.
    Waksman, Ron
    LANCET, 2017, 390 (10105): : 1843 - 1852
  • [5] BIOFLOW V: COMPARISON OF ULTRATHIN SIROLIMUS-ELUTING BIORESORBABLE POLYMER STENTS WITH THIN EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING DURABLE POLYMER STENTS - TARGET VESSEL MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION ANALYSIS
    Kandzari, David E.
    Mauri, Laura
    Koolen, Jacques
    Massaro, Joseph
    Doros, Gheorghe
    Garcia, Hector Garcia
    Cutlip, Donald
    Waksman, Ron
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 1017 - 1017
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
    Waksman, Ron
    Shlofmitz, Evan
    Windecker, Stephan
    Koolen, Jacques J.
    Saito, Shigeru
    Kandzari, David
    Kolm, Paul
    Lipinski, Michael J.
    Torguson, Rebecca
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 124 (07): : 1020 - 1026
  • [7] DIFFERENTIAL VASCULAR HEALING PATTERNS WITH RAPID ABSORPTION BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS VERSUS DURABLE POLYMER EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS
    Tada, Tomohisa
    Byrne, Robert
    Cuni, Rezarta
    King, Lamin
    Joner, Michael
    Schomig, Albert
    Kastrati, Adnan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (13) : E316 - E316
  • [8] Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable -Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial
    Kandzari, David E.
    Koolen, Jacques J.
    Doros, Gheorghe
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    Bennett, Johan
    Roguin, Ariel
    Gharib, Elie G.
    Cutlip, Donald E.
    Waksman, Ron
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (11) : 1343 - 1353
  • [9] Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization (BIOFLOW V): Acute Coronary Syndrome Subgroup Analysis.
    Roguin, Ariel
    Kandzari, David
    Marcusohn, Erez
    Koolen, Jacques J.
    Doros, Gheorghe
    Massaro, Joseph
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector
    Bennett, Johan
    Gharib, Elie
    Cutlip, Donald
    Waksman, Ron
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (13) : B39 - B40
  • [10] Endothelial Barrier Protein Expression in Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents
    Mori, Hiroyoshi
    Cheng, Qi
    Lutter, Christoph
    Smith, Samantha
    Guo, Liang
    Kutyna, Matthew
    Torii, Sho
    Harari, Emanuel
    Acampado, Eduardo
    Joner, Michael
    Kolodgie, Frank D.
    Virmani, Renu
    Finn, Aloke V.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (23) : 2375 - +