Potentilla L. sect. Rivales WOLF and related taxa in the Baltic states

被引:4
|
作者
Leht, M
Paal, J
机构
[1] Estonian Agr Univ, Inst Zool & Bot, EE-2400 Tartu, Estonia
[2] Tartu State Univ, Inst Bot & Ecol, EE-2400 Tartu, Estonia
关键词
morphology; multivariate methods; Potentilla sect. Argentene; Potentilla sect. Rectae; Potentilla sect. Chrysanthae; taxonomy;
D O I
10.1007/BF02913344
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Morphological variation of Potentilla norvegica L., P. heidenreichii ZIMMETER and P. supina L. usually treated within the section Rivales WOLF, P. recta L. (sect. Rectae WOLF), P. canescens BESS., P. argentea L. s.l, P. collina WIBEL (sect. Argenteae WOLF) and P. goldbachii RUPR. (sect. Chrysanthae WOLF) was studied using multivariate statistical methods. According to k-means clustering, P. canescens stands closer to P. heidenreichii of the sect. Rivales than to P. argentea. P: collins, the other representative of sect Argenteae, is not connected with P. canescens at all. Therefore, P. canescens should belong to sect. Rivales and not to Sect. Argenteae. In Potentilla argentea s.l., P. impolita WAHLENB., P. argentea L. var. argentea, var. decumbens (JORD.) LEHM., var, demissa (JORD.) LEHM., var, grandiceps (ZIMMETER) ROUY et E.G. CAMUS and var. tenerrima (VELEN.) WOLF were identified. P. impolita specimens did not cluster out into a separate cluster as did P. collina, P. canescens and P. heidenreichii, but formed mixed clusters with different varieties of P. argentea s.str. Therefore, P. impolita is not worthy of the rank of species and evidently not even that of subspecies, and should be treated as a variety - P. argentea var. incanescens (OPIZ) FOCKE.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 186
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Potentilla L. sect.Rivales Wolf and related taxa in the Baltic states
    Malle Leht
    Jaanus Paal
    Folia Geobotanica, 1998, 33 : 171 - 186
  • [2] Variation in Potentilla sect. Aureae (Rosaceae) in the Baltic states
    Leht, M
    Paal, J
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1998, 18 (03) : 339 - 351
  • [3] Pollen morphology of some Allium L. taxa (sect. Codonoprasum/Alliaceae) in Turkey
    Kocyigit, Mine
    Odabasi, Nevin Safak
    ISTANBUL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY, 2014, 44 (01): : 79 - 87
  • [4] FLORAL MORPHOLOGY RESOLVES THE TAXONOMY OF CAMELLIA L. (THEACEAE) SECT. OLEIFERA AND SECT. PARACAMELLIA
    Jiang, W.
    Nitin, M.
    Jiang, B.
    Zheng, Y. P.
    Hong, S. S.
    Lu, H. F.
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF PLANT TAXONOMY, 2012, 19 (02) : 155 - 165
  • [5] Restoration of Suaeda sect. Helicilla (Chenopodiaceae) and typification of its related taxa
    Freitag, Helmut
    Lomonosova, Maria N.
    PHYTOTAXA, 2017, 323 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [6] MORPHOLOGICAL HOMOPLASY AND SECTIONAL POLYPHYLY IN CENTAUREA SECT. CYNAROIDES AND RELATED TAXA
    Bona, Mehmet
    Hughes, Mark
    GENETIKA-BELGRADE, 2022, 54 (02): : 515 - 537
  • [7] Morphological study of three taxa of the genus Rubus L. sect. Rubus (Rosaceae) in Western Central Italy
    Abbate, G
    Bonacquisti, S
    Scassellati, E
    PLANT BIOSYSTEMS, 2002, 136 (03): : 321 - 330
  • [8] Seed morphology of Erica L. sect. Chlorocodon Bentham
    Fagúndez, J
    Izco, J
    ACTA BOTANICA GALLICA, 2003, 150 (04) : 401 - 410
  • [9] Comparative analysis of the whole mitochondrial genomes of four species in sect. Chrysantha (Camellia L.), endemic taxa in China
    Li, Zhi
    Ran, Zhaohui
    Xiao, Xu
    Yan, Chao
    Xu, Jian
    Tang, Ming
    An, Mingtai
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [10] A contribution to the genus Allium L. (Sect. Codonoprasum) in Turkey
    Kocyigit, Mine
    Ozhatay, Neriman
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2010, 34 (05) : 391 - 395