Survival and disease-free benefits with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy for early breast cancer: a meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Chen, Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Lei [1 ]
Gao, Bo [2 ,3 ]
Cheng, Zhi-yuan [2 ,3 ]
Jin, Jiaxin [4 ]
Yang, Ke-hu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 1, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Key Lab Evidence Based Med & Knowledge Translat G, 1 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[4] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 2, Hosp 2, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; Mastectomy; Breast conservation therapy; Meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-016-3830-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The objective of the present meta-analysis was to estimate the magnitude of survival and disease-free benefits from mastectomy compared with breast conservation therapy (BCT) in patients with early breast cancer. We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese biomedical literature database from their inception to May 2015. All the data were independently extracted from the publications by two reviewers. Results regarding the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the meta-analysis were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Nine randomized control trials were eligible for final meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that mastectomy provided significant benefit in OS compared with BCT (HR 1.09, 95 % CI 1.01-1.19; P = 0.03). Sensitivity analysis gives similar OS estimates (HR 1.12, 95 % CI 1.01-1.25). In the subgroup analysis of patients according to tumor size, the pooled HRs for OS indicated that there is a borderline statistical difference between two arms in the subgroup with tumor size ranging between >= 2 cm and <5 cm (HR 1.09, 95 % CI 1.00-1.19), but subgroup analysis of tumor size <2 cm showed no statistically significant difference in OS (HR 1.08, 95 % CI 0.88-1.33) when comparing the BCT arm with the mastectomy arm. There was no significant difference in DFS between BCT and mastectomy groups (HR 1.08, 95 % CI 0.99-1.18; P = 0.08). Sensitivity analysis also gives similar DFS estimates (HR 1.11, 95 % CI 0.96-1.27). Subgroup analysis indicated that the pooled HRs for DFS did not favor mastectomy arm or BCT arm either in the subgroup with tumor size <2 cm (HR 1.09, 95 % CI 0.78-1.52) or in the subgroup with tumor size ranging between >= 2 cm and <5 cm (HR 1.08, 95 % CI 0.99-1.18) according to tumor size. Five-year OS decreased from 70 to 68 % with BCT. The present meta-analysis indicated that mastectomy might provide slight OS benefit compared with BCT in early breast cancer patients with larger tumor size, but the absolute survival gain is small.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 525
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Survival and disease-free benefits with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy for early breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yan Chen
    Lei Jiang
    Bo Gao
    Zhi-yuan Cheng
    Jiaxin Jin
    Ke-hu Yang
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 157 : 517 - 525
  • [2] Breast conservation versus mastectomy for metaplastic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Harris, Christopher G.
    Azimi, Farhad
    Chan, Belinda
    Graham, Susannah
    Mak, Cindy
    Warrier, Sanjay
    Eslick, Guy D.
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024,
  • [3] Breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy for breast cancer
    Royce, Trevor J.
    Gupta, Gaorav P.
    Marks, Lawrence B.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2020, 21 (04): : 492 - 494
  • [4] Local Control of Breast Conservation Therapy versus Mastectomy in Multifocal or Multicentric Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fang, Min
    Zhang, Xiaoxi
    Zhang, Hao
    Wu, Kainan
    Yu, Yue
    Sheng, Yuan
    [J]. BREAST CARE, 2019, 14 (04) : 188 - 193
  • [5] Is it Surgery or Biology? Comparing Overall Survival and Disease-free Survival between Breast-conserving Therapy and Mastectomy by Breast Cancer Phenotype
    Sparkman, Brian K.
    Wong, Tina
    Stover, Westin
    Mosquera, Catalina
    Francis, Andrew
    Bandyopadhyay, Dipankar
    He, Jian
    Urmi, Atika Farzana
    Bear, Harry
    Louie, Raphael
    McGuire, Kandace
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01) : S108 - S108
  • [6] Association of Circulating Tumor DNA With Disease-Free Survival in Breast Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Cullinane, Carolyn
    Fleming, Christina
    O'Leary, Donal Peter
    Hassan, Fara
    Kelly, Louise
    O'Sullivan, Martin J.
    Corrigan, Mark Antony
    Redmond, Henry Paul
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (11)
  • [7] MORTALITY, DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL, AND LOCAL RECURRENCE IN HYPOFRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF EARLY-STAGE BREAST CANCER: A META-ANALYSIS
    Andrade, T. R.
    Fonseca, M.
    Nazario, A.
    Segreto, H.
    Segreto, R.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A173 - A173
  • [8] Effect of Breast Conservation Therapy vs Mastectomy on Disease-Specific Survival for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
    Agarwal, Shailesh
    Pappas, Lisa
    Neumayer, Leigh
    Kokeny, Kristine
    Agarwal, Jayant
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (03) : 267 - 274
  • [9] Association between obesity with disease-free survival and overall survival in triple-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis
    Mei, Lin
    He, Lin
    Song, Yuhua
    Lv, Yang
    Zhang, Lijiu
    Hao, Fengxi
    Xu, Mengmeng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (19)
  • [10] Breast-conserving therapy vs mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer: A meta-analysis of 10-year survival
    Morris, AD
    Morris, RD
    Wilson, JF
    White, J
    Steinberg, S
    Okunieff, P
    Arriagada, R
    Le, MG
    BlichertToft, M
    vanDongen, JA
    [J]. CANCER JOURNAL, 1997, 3 (01): : 6 - 12