Optimization of correlated multiple responses of ultrasonic machining (USM) process

被引:39
|
作者
Gauri, Susanta Kumar [2 ]
Chakravorty, Rina [3 ]
Chakraborty, Shankar [1 ]
机构
[1] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Prod Engn, Kolkata 700032, W Bengal, India
[2] Indian Stat Inst, Kolkata 700108, India
[3] Indian Stat Inst, New Delhi 110016, India
关键词
USM process; Taguchi method; Signal-to-noise ratio; Optimization; Correlated responses; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SURFACE QUALITY; ROBUST DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-010-2905-y
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Ultrasonic machining (USM) process has several important performance measures (responses), some of which are correlated. For example, material removal rate and tool wear rate are highly correlated. Although in the recent past several methods have been proposed in the literature to resolve the multi-response optimization problems, only a few of them take care of the possible correlation between the responses. All these methods primarily make use of principal component analysis (PCA) to consider the possible correlation between the responses. Process engineers may face the difficulty of selecting the appropriate method because the relative optimization performances of these methods are unknown. In this paper, two sets of past experimental data on USM process are analysed using three methods dealing with the multiple correlated responses, and the optimization performances of these three methods are subsequently compared. It is observed that both the weighted principal component (WPC) and PCA-based TOPSIS methods result in a better optimization performance than the PCA-based grey relational analysis method. However, the WPC method is preferable because of its simpler computational procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1127
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization of correlated multiple responses of ultrasonic machining (USM) process
    Susanta Kumar Gauri
    Rina Chakravorty
    Shankar Chakraborty
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 53 : 1115 - 1127
  • [2] Multi-responses optimization of ultrasonic machining process
    Teimouri, R.
    Baseri, H.
    Moharami, Rasoul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2015, 26 (04) : 745 - 753
  • [3] Multi-responses optimization of ultrasonic machining process
    R. Teimouri
    H. Baseri
    Rasoul Moharami
    [J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2015, 26 : 745 - 753
  • [4] Simultaneous Optimization of Multiple Correlated Responses with Application to a Thermal Spraying Process
    Rudak, Nikolaus
    Hussong, Birger
    Kuhnt, Sonja
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 31 (07) : 1223 - 1238
  • [5] Optimization of Correlated Responses of EDM Process
    Chakravorty, Rina
    Gauri, Susanta Kumar
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    [J]. MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2012, 27 (03) : 337 - 347
  • [6] Rotary ultrasonic machining of alumina ceramic: Experimental study and optimization of machining responses
    Singh, Ravi Pratap
    Singhal, Sandeep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2018, 6 (01): : 192 - 215
  • [7] United optimization strategy of ultrasonic vibration assisted process and multiple parameters for machining deformation reduction
    Zhao, Shengqiang
    Zhang, Hua
    Peng, Fangyu
    Tang, Xiaowei
    Sun, Hao
    Yan, Rong
    [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2024, 131 : 1942 - 1958
  • [8] Parameter Optimization of Ultrasonic Machining Process Using Nontraditional Optimization Algorithms
    Rao, Ravipudi Venkata
    Pawar, P. J.
    Davim, J. P.
    [J]. MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2010, 25 (10) : 1120 - 1130
  • [9] Role of sacrificing layer on glasses during ultrasonic machining (USM) - a review
    Rai S.
    Srivastava S.
    Vishnoi M.
    Mamatha T.G.
    [J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, 78 : 594 - 602
  • [10] Ultrasonic Machining Process Optimization by Cuckoo Search and Chicken Swarm Optimization Algorithms
    Acherjee, Bappa
    Maity, Debanjan
    Kuar, Arunanshu S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED METAHEURISTIC COMPUTING, 2020, 11 (02) : 1 - 26