Comparison of intravaginal misoprostol alone to combination of intravaginal misoprostol and extraamniotic Foley catheter for the second trimester termination of pregnancies

被引:2
|
作者
Toptas, Tayfun [1 ]
Mendilcioglu, Inanc [1 ]
Simsek, Mehmet [1 ]
Taskin, Omur [1 ]
机构
[1] Akdeniz Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, TR-07058 Antalya, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.10.323
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
305
引用
收藏
页码:S126 / S126
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intravaginal misoprostol alone versus intravaginal misoprostol and extraamniotic Foley catheter for second trimester pregnancy termination: an observational study
    Toptas, Tayfun
    Mendilcioglu, Inanc
    Simsek, Mehmet
    Taskin, Omur
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2014, 85 (08) : 577 - 581
  • [2] Comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter alone or in combination for termination of second trimester pregnancy
    Rezk, Mohamed Abd-Allah
    Sanad, Zakaria
    Dawood, Ragab
    Emarh, Mohamed
    Masood, Alaa
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (01): : 93 - 96
  • [3] A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol with extraamniotic ethacridine lactate for second trimester MTP
    Snehamay, Chaudhuri
    Nath, Mitra Sankar
    Nilanjana, Chaudhuri
    Debasish, Chattopadhya
    Debdut, Banerjee
    Sudipta, Bose
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2006, 56 (06): : 518 - 521
  • [4] Intravaginal misoprostol for termination of second trimester pregnancy
    Tripti, Nagaria
    Namrata, Sirmor
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2007, 57 (05): : 435 - 438
  • [5] Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter–intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone
    A. Babatunde Ande
    C. Michael Ezeanochie
    N. Biodun Olagbuji
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 285 : 967 - 971
  • [6] Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone
    Ande, A. Babatunde
    Ezeanochie, C. Michael
    Olagbuji, N. Biodun
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 285 (04) : 967 - 971
  • [7] Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Howard Hao
    Huang, Ben-Shian
    Cheng, Min
    Yeh, Chang-Ching
    Lin, I-Chia
    Horng, Huann-Cheng
    Huang, Hsin-Yi
    Lee, Wen-Ling
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (06)
  • [8] Comparison of oral, intravaginal and combination misoprostol therapy for second trimester inductions
    Kmak, D
    Refuerzo, J
    Johnson, A
    Blackwell, S
    McNeeley, G
    Qureshi, F
    Jacques, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S205 - S205
  • [9] Second trimester pregnancy termination: A comparison of 600 and 800 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol
    Herabutya, Y
    Chanrachakul, B
    Punyavachira, P
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2001, 27 (03) : 125 - 128
  • [10] Second Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy with Combined Intracervical and Intravaginal Misoprostol: Comparative Analysis with Intravaginal Misoprostol—A Pilot Study
    Desai G.S.
    Chandavarkar A.
    Gopal S.
    Sawant G.
    Desai S.V.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2016, 66 (Suppl 1) : 157 - 160