Does participatory forest management program lead to efficient forest resource use and improved rural livelihoods? Experiences from Mua-Livulezi Forest Reserve, Malawi

被引:19
|
作者
Senganimalunje, T. C. [1 ,2 ]
Chirwa, P. W. [2 ]
Babalola, F. D. [2 ,3 ]
Graham, M. A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Malawi Coll Forestry & Wildlife, Private Bag 6, Dedza, Malawi
[2] Univ Pretoria, Fac Nat & Agr Sci, Forest Sci Postgrad Program, 5-15 Plant Sci Complex, ZA-0028 Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Univ Ilorin, Dept Forest Resources Management, PMB 1515, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
[4] Univ Pretoria, Fac Engn Bldg & IT, Dept Informat Sci, 6-21 Informat Technol Bldg, ZA-0028 Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Participatory forestry; Forest use; Firewood; Forest access; Community organisation; Rural livelihoods; POVERTY ALLEVIATION; COLLECTIVE MANAGEMENT; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; COMMUNITY FOREST; SAFETY-NETS; PRODUCTS; DEPENDENCE; INCOMES; POLICY; DEFORESTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10457-015-9826-6
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the efficacy of Improved Forest Management for Sustainable Livelihoods Program in communities adjacent to Mua-Livulezi Forest Reserve, Malawi. The program is specifically aimed at alleviating poverty and enhance rural livelihoods through promoting greater community involvement in forest management while providing access and associated benefits. The study therefore evaluated the effect of the program on community organisation, forest access, forest use, product availability and commercialisation of forest products. The results show that despite the program putting in place strategies for the people to access different products for different uses; forest use is restricted mainly to subsistence use rather than cash income. The main forest product collected by the people for livelihood was firewood, mainly for cooking and heating. This is an indication that forests are an important natural capital for subsistence rather than cash income. Gender, location of the village, and distance to the nearest forest area were significant predictors of households' forest use. Introduction of the co-management program has not brought out the expected outcomes in areas of community organization, forest access, forest product availability and commercialisation of forest products. A multi-institutional approach is recommended to draw upon diverse talents and experiences from individual institutions both government and non-governmental in order to achieve meaningful social change.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 710
页数:20
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Does participatory forest management program lead to efficient forest resource use and improved rural livelihoods? Experiences from Mua-Livulezi Forest Reserve, Malawi
    T. C. Senganimalunje
    P. W. Chirwa
    F. D. Babalola
    M. A. Graham
    [J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2016, 90 : 691 - 710
  • [2] Potential of institutional arrangements for sustainable management of forests under co-management with local forest organisations in Mua-Livulezi Forest Reserve, Mtakataka, Malawi
    Senganimalunje, T. C.
    Chirwa, P. W.
    Babalola, F. D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2015, 17 (03) : 340 - 354
  • [3] Consequences of an Improved Road Network in Rural Iran: Does it Lead to Better Livelihoods and Forest Protection?
    Soltani, Arezoo
    Sankhayan, Prem L.
    Hofstad, Ole
    Eshraghi, Farshid
    Arabmazar, Abbas
    [J]. SMALL-SCALE FORESTRY, 2017, 16 (03) : 347 - 365
  • [4] Consequences of an Improved Road Network in Rural Iran: Does it Lead to Better Livelihoods and Forest Protection?
    Arezoo Soltani
    Prem L. Sankhayan
    Ole Hofstad
    Farshid Eshraghi
    Abbas Arabmazar
    [J]. Small-scale Forestry, 2017, 16 : 347 - 365