Comparative life cycle assessment of three biohydrogen pathways

被引:62
|
作者
Djomo, Sylvestre Njakou [1 ,2 ]
Blumberga, Dagnija [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Biol, Res Grp Plant & Vegetat Ecol, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Riga Tech Univ, Fac Power & Elect Engn, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia
关键词
Hydrogen; Energy balance; Wheat straw; Potato peels; Sweet sorghum stalk; BIOLOGICAL HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; SWEET SORGHUM; ENERGY; BIOETHANOL; BIOMASS; PRETREATMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.139
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
A life cycle assessment was performed to quantify and compare the energetic and environmental performances of hydrogen from wheat straw (WS-H-2), sweet sorghum stalk (SSS-H-2), and steam potato peels (SPP-H-2). Inventory data were derived from a pilot plant. Impacts were assessed using the impact 2002+ method. When co-product was not considered, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were 5.60 kg CO2eq kg(-1) H-2 for WS-H-2, 5.32 kg CO2eq kg(-1) H-2 for SSS-H-2, and 5.18 kg CO2eq kg(-1) H-2 for SPP-H-2 center dot BioH(2) pathways reduced GHG emissions by 52-56% compared to diesel and by 54-57% compared to steam methane reforming production of H2. The energy ratios (ER) were also comparable: 1.08 for WS-H-2, 1.14 for SSS-H-2 and 1.17 for SPP-H-2. A shift from SPP-H-2 to WS-H2 would therefore not affect the ER and GHG emissions of these BioH2 pathways. When co-product was considered, a shift from SPP-H2 to WS-H2 or SSS-H2 decreased the ER, while increasing the GHG emissions significantly. Co-product yield should be considered when selecting BioH(2) feedstocks. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2684 / 2694
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of biohydrogen production in photosynthetic processes
    Romagnoli, Francesco
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    Pilicka, Iluta
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (13) : 7866 - 7871
  • [2] Life-Cycle Assessment of Adsorbents for Biohydrogen Production
    Seo, Yuna
    Suzuki, Masaya
    Takagi, Tetsuichi
    Dowaki, Kiyoshi
    [J]. RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (01):
  • [3] A comparative life cycle assessment of end-of-life treatment pathways for photovoltaic backsheets
    Aryan, Venkat
    Font-Brucart, Merce
    Maga, Daniel
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2018, 26 (07): : 443 - 459
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of biohydrogen production as a transportation fuel in Germany
    Wulf, Christina
    Kaltschmitt, Martin
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 150 : 466 - 475
  • [5] Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen pathways from fossil sources in China
    Dong, Jun
    Liu, Xiaotong
    Xu, Xinhai
    Zhang, Shuyang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2016, 40 (15) : 2105 - 2116
  • [6] Techno-economic assessment and life cycle assessment of three potential pathways for biomass liquefaction
    Patil, Akash
    Benavides, Pahola Thathiana
    Monceaux, Dale A.
    Engelberth, Abigail S.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 21
  • [7] Comparative life cycle assessment of biochar-based lignocellulosic biohydrogen production: Sustainability analysis and strategy optimization
    Wang, Zi-Han
    Li, Lan-Qing
    Zhao, Lei
    Chen, Chuan
    Yang, Shan-Shan
    Ren, Nan-Qi
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 344
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of biohydrogen and biomethane production and utilisation as a vehicle fuel
    Patterson, Tim
    Esteves, Sandra
    Dinsdale, Richard
    Guwy, Alan
    Maddy, Jon
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 131 : 235 - 245
  • [9] Comparative life cycle assessment of three 2030 scenarios of the Brazilian cement industry
    Palermo, Giuseppe Cernicchiaro
    Castelo Branco, David Alves
    Oliveira Fiorini, Ana Carolina
    Vasconcelos de Freitas, Marcos Aurelio
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (03)
  • [10] Comparative life cycle assessment of three 2030 scenarios of the Brazilian cement industry
    Giuseppe Cernicchiaro Palermo
    David Alves Castelo Branco
    Ana Carolina Oliveira Fiorini
    Marcos Aurélio Vasconcelos de Freitas
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194