Contact allergy to preservatives in Taiwan between 1996 and 2015

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Yen-Kai [1 ]
Wu, Yu-Hung [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Po-Hsuan [1 ,2 ]
Tu, Mei-Eng [1 ]
机构
[1] Mackay Mem Hosp, Dept Dermatol, 92,Sec 2,Zhongshan North Rd, Taipei 10449, Taiwan
[2] Mackay Med Coll, Dept Med, New Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Contact dermatitis; methylchloroisothiazolinone; methylisothiazolinone; parabens; preservatives; DERMATITIS GROUP; METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE; METHYLCHLOROISOTHIAZOLINONE/METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE; SENSITIVITY; MULTICENTER; COSMETICS; FORMALDEHYDE; PREVALENCE; EPIDEMIC; EUROPE;
D O I
10.4103/ds.ds_21_18
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Preservatives are widely used in personal and industrial products. Frequent and sustained exposure to preservatives can cause contact allergy. Objective: We investigated the prevalence of contact allergic reactions to common preservatives in Taiwan over a 20-year period. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted among patients with allergic contact dermatitis who underwent patch testing at our clinic between 1996 and 2015. Patients who showed positive reactions to preservatives were enrolled. The location of the reaction, likely source of the allergen, and patient occupation, sex, and age were recorded. Thirteen common preservatives, including methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI), MI, formaldehyde (FA), paraben mix, and quaternium-15, were investigated. Results: Of 757 enrolled patients, 151 showed at least one positive reaction to preservatives. Allergy to MCI/MI (12.5%), the most frequent allergen in the standard series, showed a steeply increasing trend over time. FA (4.8%) and paraben mix (2.1%) were the next common allergens. Cosmetic products were the most common source of exposure (63.6%), while hairdressers and massage therapists were most commonly associated with occupational contact dermatitis. A sharp increase of sensitivity to MCI/MI was observed after 2006 and that of allergy to MI after 2013. Conclusions: In Taiwan, the prevalence of contact allergy to MCI/MI, MI, and parabens has increased in recent years. Individuals who are frequently exposed to cosmetic products should consider precautions against sensitization.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 128
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contact allergy to preservatives. Analysis of IVDK data 1996-2009
    Schnuch, A.
    Lessmann, H.
    Geier, J.
    Uter, W.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2011, 164 (06) : 1316 - 1325
  • [2] CONTACT ALLERGY TO PRESERVATIVES .1.
    DEGROOT, AC
    WEYLAND, JW
    BOS, JD
    JAGTMAN, BA
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1986, 14 (02) : 120 - 122
  • [3] CONTACT ALLERGY TO PRESERVATIVES .2.
    DEGROOT, AC
    BOS, JD
    JAGTMAN, BA
    BRUYNZEEL, DP
    VANJOOST, T
    WEYLAND, JW
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1986, 15 (04) : 218 - 222
  • [4] Contact allergy to preservatives. Results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) 1996 to 2007
    Schnuch, Axel
    Uter, Wolfgang
    Lessmann, Holger
    Geier, Johannes
    [J]. ALLERGO JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (08) : 631 - 638
  • [5] Contact allergy to methyldibromoglutaronitrile and certain other preservatives
    Okkerse, A
    GeursenReitsma, AM
    VanJoost, T
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1996, 34 (02) : 151 - 152
  • [6] INCREASE IN PREVALENCE OF CONTACT ALLERGY TO SELECT PRESERVATIVES IN LITHUANIA
    Blaziene, A.
    Malinauskiene, L.
    DuBuske, L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 117 (05) : S46 - S46
  • [7] The Development of Contact Allergy against Preservatives in recent Years
    Geier, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2017, 15 : 16 - 16
  • [8] Contact allergy testing alternatives: 1996
    Scheman, A
    [J]. CUTIS, 1996, 57 (04): : 235 - 240
  • [10] Contact allergy to preservatives in patients with occupational contact dermatitis and exposure analysis of preservatives in registered chemical products for occupational use
    Schwensen, Jakob Ferlov
    Friis, Ulrik Fischer
    Menne, Torkil
    Flyvholm, Mari-Ann
    Johansen, Jeanne Duus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 90 (04) : 319 - 333